"The biggest problem that we have is that California is being run now by special interests. All of the politicians are not anymore making the moves for the people, but for special interests and we have to stop that"
About this Quote
Schwarzenegger casts Sacramento as captured by moneyed forces, a place where elected officials answer first to donors and lobbyists rather than voters. The language is sweeping and accusatory, using all to dramatize a sense of crisis and we to recruit a broad public into an urgent corrective. It is classic populist framing: the people versus the special interests, moral clarity against transactional politics.
The context is the 2003 California recall, when anger over rolling blackouts, budget deficits, and perceived pay-to-play fund-raising helped topple Governor Gray Davis. As a celebrity outsider, Schwarzenegger presented himself as unbought and unbossed, promising to clean up a Capitol he said was dominated by public sector unions, corporate lobbyists, trial lawyers, and gaming interests. The vagueness of special interests was an asset, allowing diverse frustrations to coalesce without alienating potential supporters. It also obscured the reality that advocacy groups, even unpopular ones, often represent real constituencies, and that democratic politics is necessarily a negotiation among organized interests.
The statement points toward procedural reform rather than ideological change. Its implicit remedies are campaign finance limits, lobbying transparency, independent redistricting, spending discipline, and primary systems that reward broader appeal. Schwarzenegger later championed some of these, notably an independent redistricting commission and a top-two primary, while suffering setbacks in a 2005 special election aimed at curbing union power and changing budget rules. His governorship laid bare the tension in the rhetoric: to get anything done, an executive must still bargain with the very groups he denounces, and money remains a lubricant in American politics.
Yet the appeal endures because it names a real fear: that policy is too often set in private rooms by those who can afford access. The line distilled a moment of distrust into a simple mandate to restore public primacy. It helped fuel an outsider rise and continues to echo whenever voters feel representation has tilted away from them.
The context is the 2003 California recall, when anger over rolling blackouts, budget deficits, and perceived pay-to-play fund-raising helped topple Governor Gray Davis. As a celebrity outsider, Schwarzenegger presented himself as unbought and unbossed, promising to clean up a Capitol he said was dominated by public sector unions, corporate lobbyists, trial lawyers, and gaming interests. The vagueness of special interests was an asset, allowing diverse frustrations to coalesce without alienating potential supporters. It also obscured the reality that advocacy groups, even unpopular ones, often represent real constituencies, and that democratic politics is necessarily a negotiation among organized interests.
The statement points toward procedural reform rather than ideological change. Its implicit remedies are campaign finance limits, lobbying transparency, independent redistricting, spending discipline, and primary systems that reward broader appeal. Schwarzenegger later championed some of these, notably an independent redistricting commission and a top-two primary, while suffering setbacks in a 2005 special election aimed at curbing union power and changing budget rules. His governorship laid bare the tension in the rhetoric: to get anything done, an executive must still bargain with the very groups he denounces, and money remains a lubricant in American politics.
Yet the appeal endures because it names a real fear: that policy is too often set in private rooms by those who can afford access. The line distilled a moment of distrust into a simple mandate to restore public primacy. It helped fuel an outsider rise and continues to echo whenever voters feel representation has tilted away from them.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Arnold
Add to List
