"The characteristic of scientific progress is our knowing that we did not know"
About this Quote
Scientific progress, Bachelard suggests, isn’t a victory parade of accumulating facts; it’s the slow, bruising art of self-indictment. The line turns the usual story of science on its head. What marks an advance is not just that we know more, but that we acquire a sharper sense of how wrong, partial, or lazy our previous “knowledge” was. Progress is measured in the expansion of error bars and the collapse of certainties.
That’s classic Bachelard: a philosopher of rupture, not continuity. Writing in the early 20th century, with relativity and quantum mechanics scrambling the furniture of classical physics, he watched “common sense” get demoted from trustworthy guide to stubborn obstacle. His broader project was to map what he called epistemological obstacles: the intuitive habits and metaphors that feel like understanding but actually block it. In that context, “knowing that we did not know” is less a humble shrug than a methodological demand. Science has to produce the conditions for its own embarrassment.
The subtext is quietly combative toward comforting narratives: the idea that inquiry naturally converges on truth, or that ignorance is merely an empty space waiting to be filled. For Bachelard, ignorance is structured; it comes bundled with false clarity. A real discovery doesn’t just add a new fact, it rewrites the ledger of what counts as a question, exposes hidden assumptions, and forces a new discipline of doubt. The progress is negative in form, but generative in effect: a more honest map begins where the old one admits it was fiction.
That’s classic Bachelard: a philosopher of rupture, not continuity. Writing in the early 20th century, with relativity and quantum mechanics scrambling the furniture of classical physics, he watched “common sense” get demoted from trustworthy guide to stubborn obstacle. His broader project was to map what he called epistemological obstacles: the intuitive habits and metaphors that feel like understanding but actually block it. In that context, “knowing that we did not know” is less a humble shrug than a methodological demand. Science has to produce the conditions for its own embarrassment.
The subtext is quietly combative toward comforting narratives: the idea that inquiry naturally converges on truth, or that ignorance is merely an empty space waiting to be filled. For Bachelard, ignorance is structured; it comes bundled with false clarity. A real discovery doesn’t just add a new fact, it rewrites the ledger of what counts as a question, exposes hidden assumptions, and forces a new discipline of doubt. The progress is negative in form, but generative in effect: a more honest map begins where the old one admits it was fiction.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Gaston
Add to List







