"The CIO put up half a million dollars for Roosevelt's 1936 campaign and provided him with an immense group of active labor workers who played a large part in the sweeping victory he won at the polls"
About this Quote
Money talks, but Flynn wants you to hear the footsteps too: half a million dollars and an “immense group of active labor workers” moving through neighborhoods, factories, and precincts like a parallel campaign apparatus. The line is built to puncture the comforting civics-myth that elections are decided by pure persuasion. He’s not describing generosity; he’s mapping leverage.
The context is 1936, when Roosevelt’s New Deal coalition crested and the newly formed CIO (Congress of Industrial Organizations) was rapidly organizing mass-production workers. Union politics weren’t a side show; they were becoming a machine with cash, bodies, and discipline. Flynn, a prominent critic of Roosevelt who drifted into fierce anti-New Deal opposition, frames this as a transactional alliance: labor finances the president; labor delivers the ground game; the president, implied, delivers policy.
Notice the rhetorical choices. “Put up” is colloquial, almost dismissive, reducing political donations to a backroom stake. “Provided him with” makes workers sound like inventory, not citizens, subtly dehumanizing labor activism to suggest orchestration rather than spontaneous support. And “played a large part” is a careful hedge: Flynn can claim he’s merely acknowledging a factor while inviting the reader to infer capture, corruption, or at least dependency.
The intent is less to recount an election than to reassign agency. Roosevelt didn’t just win; he was, in Flynn’s telling, propelled by an organized bloc whose investment demanded returns. It’s a sentence engineered to make the New Deal feel less like democratic mandate and more like negotiated power.
The context is 1936, when Roosevelt’s New Deal coalition crested and the newly formed CIO (Congress of Industrial Organizations) was rapidly organizing mass-production workers. Union politics weren’t a side show; they were becoming a machine with cash, bodies, and discipline. Flynn, a prominent critic of Roosevelt who drifted into fierce anti-New Deal opposition, frames this as a transactional alliance: labor finances the president; labor delivers the ground game; the president, implied, delivers policy.
Notice the rhetorical choices. “Put up” is colloquial, almost dismissive, reducing political donations to a backroom stake. “Provided him with” makes workers sound like inventory, not citizens, subtly dehumanizing labor activism to suggest orchestration rather than spontaneous support. And “played a large part” is a careful hedge: Flynn can claim he’s merely acknowledging a factor while inviting the reader to infer capture, corruption, or at least dependency.
The intent is less to recount an election than to reassign agency. Roosevelt didn’t just win; he was, in Flynn’s telling, propelled by an organized bloc whose investment demanded returns. It’s a sentence engineered to make the New Deal feel less like democratic mandate and more like negotiated power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List
