"The commercial broadcasters have tremendous influence in Washington, D.C., for a couple of reasons. First, they're extremely rich and they have lots of money and they have had for a long time, so they can give money to politicians, which gets their attention"
About this Quote
Power in Washington rarely announces itself with a manifesto; it shows up as a campaign check and a phone call that gets returned. Robert McChesney, a longtime media critic, is doing the unfashionable thing here: saying the quiet part plainly. The sentence is almost stubbornly unliterary, built from blunt repetitions of money, lots of money, long time. That pedestrian cadence is the point. He’s stripping away the romance of “free press” and “marketplace of ideas” to expose a more prosaic engine: capital’s ability to buy proximity.
The intent isn’t just to accuse broadcasters of corruption; it’s to reframe broadcasting as a political actor rather than a neutral pipeline. “Commercial broadcasters” aren’t simply companies selling ads, they’re institutions with regulatory needs (licenses, spectrum allocations, ownership rules) that make Washington a crucial marketplace. The subtext: when the airwaves are treated as a public resource but governed through private lobbying, democratic accountability becomes optional. Policy outcomes start to look less like public deliberation and more like a customer-service interaction for the wealthy.
Context matters: McChesney has spent decades arguing that US media policy isn’t a technocratic backwater but a central arena where democracy is quietly negotiated. By foregrounding donation-driven “attention,” he highlights a structural asymmetry: politicians can ignore citizens, but they can’t ignore the revenue streams that finance their survival. The line lands because it refuses moral theater. It’s not outrage; it’s a diagnosis.
The intent isn’t just to accuse broadcasters of corruption; it’s to reframe broadcasting as a political actor rather than a neutral pipeline. “Commercial broadcasters” aren’t simply companies selling ads, they’re institutions with regulatory needs (licenses, spectrum allocations, ownership rules) that make Washington a crucial marketplace. The subtext: when the airwaves are treated as a public resource but governed through private lobbying, democratic accountability becomes optional. Policy outcomes start to look less like public deliberation and more like a customer-service interaction for the wealthy.
Context matters: McChesney has spent decades arguing that US media policy isn’t a technocratic backwater but a central arena where democracy is quietly negotiated. By foregrounding donation-driven “attention,” he highlights a structural asymmetry: politicians can ignore citizens, but they can’t ignore the revenue streams that finance their survival. The line lands because it refuses moral theater. It’s not outrage; it’s a diagnosis.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List


