"The community stagnates without the impulse of the individual. The impulse dies away without the sympathy of the community"
About this Quote
Progress and belonging are staged here as a mutual hostage situation: the group needs the lone spark, and the spark needs a crowd willing to catch. William James, the great American psychologist-philosopher of pragmatism, isn’t romanticizing rugged individualism so much as disciplining it. He gives the individual “impulse” real power, but only as a first draft of change. Without “sympathy,” that draft never becomes a lived reality; it evaporates into eccentricity, burnout, or private conviction with no social traction.
The sentence design does the work. “Stagnates” is a harsh verb for communal life, making the status quo feel not merely calm but rancid. “Dies away” is quieter, almost tragic, suggesting how easily a person’s initiative can be extinguished when it meets indifference. James isn’t describing two separate problems; he’s mapping a feedback loop. Communities that punish deviation train their members out of originality. Individuals who treat society as disposable lose the very audience that could refine, amplify, and sustain their experiments.
Context matters: James wrote in an America being remade by industrialization, mass politics, and new social sciences, when “the crowd” and “the self” were starting to look like enemies. His pragmatism rejects that melodrama. Ideas, for James, are tools tested in public. The subtext is a warning to both camps: the community’s moral duty is receptivity, not just regulation; the individual’s moral duty is contribution, not just self-expression. Sympathy here isn’t sentimentality. It’s the social infrastructure that keeps a new impulse from becoming a lonely flicker.
The sentence design does the work. “Stagnates” is a harsh verb for communal life, making the status quo feel not merely calm but rancid. “Dies away” is quieter, almost tragic, suggesting how easily a person’s initiative can be extinguished when it meets indifference. James isn’t describing two separate problems; he’s mapping a feedback loop. Communities that punish deviation train their members out of originality. Individuals who treat society as disposable lose the very audience that could refine, amplify, and sustain their experiments.
Context matters: James wrote in an America being remade by industrialization, mass politics, and new social sciences, when “the crowd” and “the self” were starting to look like enemies. His pragmatism rejects that melodrama. Ideas, for James, are tools tested in public. The subtext is a warning to both camps: the community’s moral duty is receptivity, not just regulation; the individual’s moral duty is contribution, not just self-expression. Sympathy here isn’t sentimentality. It’s the social infrastructure that keeps a new impulse from becoming a lonely flicker.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List




