"The consideration of change over the century is about loss, though I think that social change is gain rather than loss"
About this Quote
Reflection across a long twentieth-century arc invites an elegiac mood. As technologies supersede one another, landscapes are reconfigured, and familiar rituals fade, memory gravitates toward what has gone. Penelope Lively, whose fiction and essays are steeped in time, recognizes that instinct to narrate change as diminishment. Yet she counters it with a clear ethical and historical judgment: social change, however disruptive, has enlarged human possibility.
Born in Cairo in 1933 and coming to Britain after the war, Lively witnessed austerity, the slow construction of the welfare state, the loosening of rigid class and gender hierarchies, and the remapping of Britain after empire. Her work repeatedly tests the friction between private nostalgia and public transformation. Moon Tiger interrogates how personal and national histories intertwine; later, in Ammonites and Leaping Fish, she looks back on the twentieth century with the exacting eye of someone who has lived its textures. The sense of loss is real: tactile worlds vanish, old cadences of community recede. But the ledger is not only sentimental. Expanded education, the NHS, greater autonomy for women, civil rights protections, and shifts in attitudes to sexuality and race represent gains that are structural, not merely atmospheric.
Memory catalogs absences because losses are vivid and local, whereas gains are often diffuse, normalized the moment they arrive. A demolished cinema is easier to mourn than the erosion of deference; the disappearance of handwritten letters feels more poignant than the quiet fact that more people can vote, divorce without ruin, or seek redress against discrimination. Lively refuses the consolations of selective memory. She urges a double vision: honor what was valuable in earlier ways of life while refusing to romanticize the exclusions they enforced.
The line separates two narratives of modernity: an elegy curated by memory and a record of justice written into institutions. To balance them is not to cancel grief but to ensure that feeling does not eclipse the fact of progress.
Born in Cairo in 1933 and coming to Britain after the war, Lively witnessed austerity, the slow construction of the welfare state, the loosening of rigid class and gender hierarchies, and the remapping of Britain after empire. Her work repeatedly tests the friction between private nostalgia and public transformation. Moon Tiger interrogates how personal and national histories intertwine; later, in Ammonites and Leaping Fish, she looks back on the twentieth century with the exacting eye of someone who has lived its textures. The sense of loss is real: tactile worlds vanish, old cadences of community recede. But the ledger is not only sentimental. Expanded education, the NHS, greater autonomy for women, civil rights protections, and shifts in attitudes to sexuality and race represent gains that are structural, not merely atmospheric.
Memory catalogs absences because losses are vivid and local, whereas gains are often diffuse, normalized the moment they arrive. A demolished cinema is easier to mourn than the erosion of deference; the disappearance of handwritten letters feels more poignant than the quiet fact that more people can vote, divorce without ruin, or seek redress against discrimination. Lively refuses the consolations of selective memory. She urges a double vision: honor what was valuable in earlier ways of life while refusing to romanticize the exclusions they enforced.
The line separates two narratives of modernity: an elegy curated by memory and a record of justice written into institutions. To balance them is not to cancel grief but to ensure that feeling does not eclipse the fact of progress.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Penelope
Add to List
