"The conventional viewpoint says we need a jobs program and we need to cut welfare. Just the opposite! We need more welfare and fewer jobs"
About this Quote
A politician saying we need “more welfare and fewer jobs” is either an act of rhetorical sabotage or a deliberate stress test of American pieties. Jerry Brown’s line works because it flips the moral geometry of public debate: jobs are treated as virtue, welfare as vice. By swapping them, Brown forces listeners to notice how much of “work ethic” rhetoric is really a demand for discipline and social order, not a clear-eyed plan for human well-being.
The subtext isn’t that idleness is noble. It’s that “jobs” can be a kind of bureaucratic make-work - low-wage, dead-end labor defended as character-building - while “welfare” is framed as a shameful handout even when it stabilizes families, raises children’s outcomes, and prevents crises that cost more later. Brown is poking at the idea that the market’s distribution is automatically moral: if you’re employed, you’ve earned your place; if you’re not, you’ve failed. He’s also hinting at a world where productivity (and technology) outpaces the need for human labor, making the old promise of full employment feel like a ritual rather than a strategy.
Context matters: Brown came up amid postwar liberalism’s expansion of the safety net, then watched the 1970s turn into a referendum on government “dependency.” This quip reads like an early skirmish in a fight we’re still having: whether dignity comes from wages alone, or whether society can admit - without panic - that people deserve security even when the economy doesn’t “need” them.
The subtext isn’t that idleness is noble. It’s that “jobs” can be a kind of bureaucratic make-work - low-wage, dead-end labor defended as character-building - while “welfare” is framed as a shameful handout even when it stabilizes families, raises children’s outcomes, and prevents crises that cost more later. Brown is poking at the idea that the market’s distribution is automatically moral: if you’re employed, you’ve earned your place; if you’re not, you’ve failed. He’s also hinting at a world where productivity (and technology) outpaces the need for human labor, making the old promise of full employment feel like a ritual rather than a strategy.
Context matters: Brown came up amid postwar liberalism’s expansion of the safety net, then watched the 1970s turn into a referendum on government “dependency.” This quip reads like an early skirmish in a fight we’re still having: whether dignity comes from wages alone, or whether society can admit - without panic - that people deserve security even when the economy doesn’t “need” them.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jerry
Add to List



