"The corporate grip on opinion in the United States is one of the wonders of the Western world. No First World country has ever managed to eliminate so entirely from its media all objectivity - much less dissent"
About this Quote
Vidal’s barb lands because it flatters and indicts at once: “one of the wonders of the Western world” sounds like a tourism slogan, then curdles into an accusation of soft authoritarianism. He’s not claiming the U.S. lacks a First Amendment; he’s arguing that a formally free press can still be functionally captured. The trick is in his choice of “managed,” which frames the erosion of objectivity as an achievement of systems, not a conspiracy of villains. Power doesn’t have to ban dissent if it can price it out, starve it of distribution, or drown it in safer, sponsor-friendly noise.
The subtext is vintage Vidal: the American empire congratulates itself on liberty while perfecting subtler controls. By calling corporate influence a “grip,” he conjures something physical and involuntary, a hand around the throat of public perception. “Opinion” matters more than “news” here; Vidal implies that once the boundaries of acceptable debate are set by advertisers, owners, and access journalism, the population can be steered without ever feeling coerced.
Contextually, Vidal spent decades as a patrician dissident, mocking the bipartisan consensus on war, markets, and American innocence. Coming out of the late Cold War and into the era of media consolidation, his line anticipates the logic of the 24-hour cycle: controversy is monetized, but real dissent is treated as bad for business. The punch is his comparative claim - “No First World country” - which is less a statistic than a provocation. Vidal isn’t asking to be fact-checked; he’s daring readers to notice how normalized corporate filters have become, and how quickly “objectivity” becomes a brand posture rather than a civic obligation.
The subtext is vintage Vidal: the American empire congratulates itself on liberty while perfecting subtler controls. By calling corporate influence a “grip,” he conjures something physical and involuntary, a hand around the throat of public perception. “Opinion” matters more than “news” here; Vidal implies that once the boundaries of acceptable debate are set by advertisers, owners, and access journalism, the population can be steered without ever feeling coerced.
Contextually, Vidal spent decades as a patrician dissident, mocking the bipartisan consensus on war, markets, and American innocence. Coming out of the late Cold War and into the era of media consolidation, his line anticipates the logic of the 24-hour cycle: controversy is monetized, but real dissent is treated as bad for business. The punch is his comparative claim - “No First World country” - which is less a statistic than a provocation. Vidal isn’t asking to be fact-checked; he’s daring readers to notice how normalized corporate filters have become, and how quickly “objectivity” becomes a brand posture rather than a civic obligation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Gore
Add to List

