"The creative act is like writing a letter. A letter is a project; you don't sit down to write a letter unless you know what you want to say and to whom you want to say it"
About this Quote
Creativity, Lukas Foss insists, isn’t lightning. It’s correspondence. By likening “the creative act” to writing a letter, he drags art down from the altar and back onto a desk where intention, audience, and delivery matter. A letter is personal, directed, time-bound; it presumes a recipient and therefore a responsibility. Foss’s analogy quietly rejects the romantic myth of the composer as a mystical conduit “taking dictation” from the muse. Instead, it frames composition as an act of choice: you decide what you’re trying to communicate, and you decide who you’re talking to, even if the “to whom” is an imagined listener, a future performer, a community, or a tradition you’re answering.
The subtext is almost managerial, and that’s the point. Calling a letter “a project” turns inspiration into labor: planning, revision, clarity. Foss isn’t saying art must be literal or programmatic; he’s saying it must be intentional. The “unless you know” clause is a provocation aimed at vagueness dressed up as profundity. If you can’t name the target, you’re not composing so much as generating sound.
Contextually, Foss lived through modernism’s big ideological swings: serial rigor, postwar experimentation, the rise of chance procedures, and later, pluralism. His music moved among these worlds rather than swearing allegiance to one. The letter metaphor reads as a self-defense of craft amid avant-garde fashions that sometimes celebrated process over message. Foss argues for communication without pandering: art can be complex, but it shouldn’t be indifferent to being received.
The subtext is almost managerial, and that’s the point. Calling a letter “a project” turns inspiration into labor: planning, revision, clarity. Foss isn’t saying art must be literal or programmatic; he’s saying it must be intentional. The “unless you know” clause is a provocation aimed at vagueness dressed up as profundity. If you can’t name the target, you’re not composing so much as generating sound.
Contextually, Foss lived through modernism’s big ideological swings: serial rigor, postwar experimentation, the rise of chance procedures, and later, pluralism. His music moved among these worlds rather than swearing allegiance to one. The letter metaphor reads as a self-defense of craft amid avant-garde fashions that sometimes celebrated process over message. Foss argues for communication without pandering: art can be complex, but it shouldn’t be indifferent to being received.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lukas
Add to List





