"The criterion for free choice can never be an absolute one, but neither is it entirely relative"
About this Quote
But he also blocks the easy escape hatch: if there’s no absolute standard, that doesn’t mean any choice counts as free. That’s the bite. Marcuse is writing in the shadow of mass consumer capitalism and bureaucratic governance, where people can choose endlessly while still being steered. “Entirely relative” would let power off the hook; it would imply that manipulation is just another lifestyle. He insists there are still real constraints and real distortions - ideology, false needs, social pressure - that can be criticized without pretending we have God’s-eye access to human autonomy.
The subtext is a warning aimed at a society that confuses options with liberation. Free choice is not a metaphysical trophy; it’s a contested social achievement. Marcuse’s line works because it forces a harder question than “Are you free?”: free relative to which structures, and judged by which purposes - human flourishing, non-domination, the capacity to say no? That tension is exactly where critique begins.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Marcuse, Herbert. (2026, January 16). The criterion for free choice can never be an absolute one, but neither is it entirely relative. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-criterion-for-free-choice-can-never-be-an-119182/
Chicago Style
Marcuse, Herbert. "The criterion for free choice can never be an absolute one, but neither is it entirely relative." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-criterion-for-free-choice-can-never-be-an-119182/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The criterion for free choice can never be an absolute one, but neither is it entirely relative." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-criterion-for-free-choice-can-never-be-an-119182/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







