"The critical principle demanded an examination, for instance, of the contribution of different periods, thus to some extent embarking on historical linguistics"
About this Quote
Austere on the surface, this line is Saussure quietly drawing a border around what counts as serious scholarship. The phrase "critical principle" isn’t a flourish; it’s an institutional demand. He’s pointing to a new kind of rigor that refuses to treat language as a museum piece or a list of correct forms. If you want to critique a language - really critique it - you have to account for time: "the contribution of different periods". That’s the move from timeless rules to layered evidence, from authority to method.
The subtext is almost defensive. Saussure is acknowledging that once you admit languages change, you’re forced into history whether you like it or not. He frames it cautiously - "to some extent" - as if to reassure more traditional philologists that he’s not abandoning structure for storytelling. Yet the sentence also hints at a larger pivot in the discipline: critique becomes inseparable from diachrony, from tracing how meanings, sounds, and forms drift across generations.
Context matters here: late 19th-century linguistics was dominated by comparative and historical approaches, obsessed with origins and family trees. Saussure, who would later become the patron saint of structuralism, is situated right at that hinge. He’s not rejecting historical linguistics; he’s noting how methodological scrutiny compels it - and, implicitly, how that same scrutiny will eventually justify separating the history of changes from the system operating at any given moment.
The subtext is almost defensive. Saussure is acknowledging that once you admit languages change, you’re forced into history whether you like it or not. He frames it cautiously - "to some extent" - as if to reassure more traditional philologists that he’s not abandoning structure for storytelling. Yet the sentence also hints at a larger pivot in the discipline: critique becomes inseparable from diachrony, from tracing how meanings, sounds, and forms drift across generations.
Context matters here: late 19th-century linguistics was dominated by comparative and historical approaches, obsessed with origins and family trees. Saussure, who would later become the patron saint of structuralism, is situated right at that hinge. He’s not rejecting historical linguistics; he’s noting how methodological scrutiny compels it - and, implicitly, how that same scrutiny will eventually justify separating the history of changes from the system operating at any given moment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Ferdinand
Add to List
