"The current administration has made the decision to cut dollars going for community development block grants, for various incentives to bring cities back"
About this Quote
Budget fights rarely sound like moral arguments, but Stephanie Tubbs Jones makes this one land by refusing to treat the cut as a technical adjustment. Her phrasing pins responsibility where Washington often tries to blur it: "the decision" by "the current administration". No passive voice, no inevitability. That choice of grammar is the first move in the politics of blame, and it signals what she wants the listener to hear beneath the wonk-speak: cities are being actively deprioritized.
Then she reaches for Community Development Block Grants, a program most voters can’t name but many neighborhoods can feel. CDBG money is plumbing and storefront rehab, senior centers and sidewalk fixes - the unglamorous stuff that keeps a place livable. By pairing it with "various incentives to bring cities back", she frames urban policy as recovery, not charity. "Bring cities back" implies there was a loss: deindustrialization, white flight, disinvestment, and the slow violence of neglected infrastructure. The subtext is racial and class-coded without being explicitly so; in American politics, "cities" is often shorthand for Black and working-class communities, which makes the cuts read as a signal about who counts.
The line also reflects a specific early-2000s context: a Republican-led push to shrink federal domestic spending and devolve responsibility to states and localities, even as urban needs remained federal-scale. Tubbs Jones, representing Cleveland, is arguing that you can’t demand urban revival while pulling the very tools that make it possible - and that austerity is a policy worldview, not an accounting footnote.
Then she reaches for Community Development Block Grants, a program most voters can’t name but many neighborhoods can feel. CDBG money is plumbing and storefront rehab, senior centers and sidewalk fixes - the unglamorous stuff that keeps a place livable. By pairing it with "various incentives to bring cities back", she frames urban policy as recovery, not charity. "Bring cities back" implies there was a loss: deindustrialization, white flight, disinvestment, and the slow violence of neglected infrastructure. The subtext is racial and class-coded without being explicitly so; in American politics, "cities" is often shorthand for Black and working-class communities, which makes the cuts read as a signal about who counts.
The line also reflects a specific early-2000s context: a Republican-led push to shrink federal domestic spending and devolve responsibility to states and localities, even as urban needs remained federal-scale. Tubbs Jones, representing Cleveland, is arguing that you can’t demand urban revival while pulling the very tools that make it possible - and that austerity is a policy worldview, not an accounting footnote.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Stephanie
Add to List

