"The days when a car aficionado could repair his or her own car are long past, due primarily to the high software content"
About this Quote
Nostalgia is doing real work here, but it is nostalgia with a venture-capital agenda. Andreessen frames the disappearance of the DIY car tinkerer as a historical inevitability: not regulation, not corporate strategy, not design choices, but the neutral march of “high software content.” That phrasing quietly launders power. If the barrier is software complexity, then the people who control software - manufacturers, platform owners, and the firms that supply their code - become the natural arbiters of what repair even means.
The quote also smuggles in a cultural demotion. The car aficionado was once a symbol of mechanical intimacy and autonomy: you understood the machine because you could touch it. Software breaks that relationship by moving the “real” car into sealed modules and proprietary interfaces. You can still lift the hood, but the hood is no longer where the car lives. The subtext is about ownership in the age of licensing: you may possess the object, yet access to its functionality is mediated by passwords, diagnostic tools, firmware locks, and terms of service.
Andreessen’s context matters: a Silicon Valley figure describing a world that conveniently needs Silicon Valley. It reads as observation, but it doubles as justification for an economy where value accrues to those who write and control code. The line lands because it names a felt experience - things are harder to fix, more opaque, less yours - while sidestepping the political fight embedded in “right to repair.” It’s not just that cars changed; the social contract around them did.
The quote also smuggles in a cultural demotion. The car aficionado was once a symbol of mechanical intimacy and autonomy: you understood the machine because you could touch it. Software breaks that relationship by moving the “real” car into sealed modules and proprietary interfaces. You can still lift the hood, but the hood is no longer where the car lives. The subtext is about ownership in the age of licensing: you may possess the object, yet access to its functionality is mediated by passwords, diagnostic tools, firmware locks, and terms of service.
Andreessen’s context matters: a Silicon Valley figure describing a world that conveniently needs Silicon Valley. It reads as observation, but it doubles as justification for an economy where value accrues to those who write and control code. The line lands because it names a felt experience - things are harder to fix, more opaque, less yours - while sidestepping the political fight embedded in “right to repair.” It’s not just that cars changed; the social contract around them did.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Marc
Add to List
