Faith & Spirit Quote by Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel

Schlegel smuggles a quiet provocation into what looks like a tidy distinction. Religion and morality, he suggests, don’t differ by content so much as by jurisdiction: the “classical division” between divine and human. That phrasing matters. “Classical” signals a world before modern bureaucratic ethics, when the gods, fate, and the polis were all legitimate explanatory engines. Schlegel is pointing to an older cultural grammar in which morality is the human art of living together, while religion is the interpretive frame that elevates (or authorizes) that art by placing it under a divine horizon.

The loaded hinge is “if one only interprets this correctly.” It’s a Romantic warning shot at literalism. Schlegel isn’t granting religion automatic superiority; he’s insisting the divine/human split is not a hard border but a way of reading experience. Interpreted “correctly,” the divine isn’t a supernatural police force handing down rules. It’s the name for what exceeds us: the infinite, the absolute, the meaning we can’t fully domesticate. Morality, then, becomes the human translation of that excess into habits, duties, and social forms.

Context sharpens the intent. In late-18th/early-19th-century Germany, post-Enlightenment thinkers were trying to rescue spirituality from both dogma and cold rational ethics. As a poet and critic, Schlegel treats categories as aesthetic and historical constructs, not eternal containers. The subtext: stop confusing ethical life with theological compliance, and stop pretending ethics can remain untouched by the stories, symbols, and transcendence-claims that cultures live by.