"The dynamic, creative present, however conditioned and restricted by the effects of prior presents, possesses genuine initiative"
About this Quote
Lamont is trying to rescue free will from the twin traps of fatalism and mystical escape hatches. The sentence is built like a philosophical judo move: concede the weight of the past, then flip it. “However conditioned and restricted” is the nod to causality, social structure, psychology, and history - all the forces that make human choice feel like a rerun. But he refuses to let that concession become a surrender. By insisting the present is “dynamic” and “creative,” Lamont smuggles in a vision of time where novelty is not an illusion or a rounding error; it’s a property of lived reality.
The key term is “genuine initiative.” He’s not claiming we act in a vacuum, only that agency survives inside constraints. That phrasing matters because it aims at a common modern cynicism: if everything has causes, then responsibility is theater. Lamont’s subtext is ethical and political as much as metaphysical. A society that believes the future is merely the past playing out will excuse cruelty as inevitability and treat reform as naive. A society that grants “initiative” to the present can still talk about blame, praise, solidarity, and deliberate change without pretending people are unconditioned atoms.
Contextually, Lamont wrote as a secular humanist in a century obsessed with systems - Marxist determinism, Freudian drives, behaviorist conditioning, and the shadow of totalitarian “historical necessity.” His line is a compact rebuttal: yes, history presses down, but the present still pushes back.
The key term is “genuine initiative.” He’s not claiming we act in a vacuum, only that agency survives inside constraints. That phrasing matters because it aims at a common modern cynicism: if everything has causes, then responsibility is theater. Lamont’s subtext is ethical and political as much as metaphysical. A society that believes the future is merely the past playing out will excuse cruelty as inevitability and treat reform as naive. A society that grants “initiative” to the present can still talk about blame, praise, solidarity, and deliberate change without pretending people are unconditioned atoms.
Contextually, Lamont wrote as a secular humanist in a century obsessed with systems - Marxist determinism, Freudian drives, behaviorist conditioning, and the shadow of totalitarian “historical necessity.” His line is a compact rebuttal: yes, history presses down, but the present still pushes back.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|
More Quotes by Corliss
Add to List





