"The early firings contained many stones"
About this Quote
Goldsworthy’s line reads like a diary note from the edge of the kiln: plainspoken, almost stubbornly unliterary, and then it lands. “The early firings” frames failure as a phase, not a verdict. He’s talking about process, not product - the first attempts where technique is still being negotiated with material. In a studio culture that loves the myth of effortless genius, he’s insisting on the opposite: art begins as debris.
“Contained many stones” is the sly turn. Stones don’t belong in firings in the conventional, clean-room version of craft. They’re impurities, accidents, the stuff you’re supposed to sift out. Goldsworthy flips that expectation. The stones are both literal (grit, fragments, things caught in clay or ash) and emblematic: the stubborn facts of the outdoors, weather, entropy, the whole messy world his work refuses to seal off. His practice has always been about making with what’s there - leaves, ice, mud - and letting the environment collaborate, even sabotage. Stones are collaboration at its most unromantic.
There’s also a quiet theology of consequence here. Firing is transformation by heat, pressure, risk; you don’t get to “undo” it. By admitting the early firings were full of stones, he’s admitting the work was full of resistance - not just technical flaws, but the artist’s own unrefined intentions. The subtext is permission: the rough, obstructed beginnings aren’t a detour from the work. They’re the work, before it learned how to hold.
“Contained many stones” is the sly turn. Stones don’t belong in firings in the conventional, clean-room version of craft. They’re impurities, accidents, the stuff you’re supposed to sift out. Goldsworthy flips that expectation. The stones are both literal (grit, fragments, things caught in clay or ash) and emblematic: the stubborn facts of the outdoors, weather, entropy, the whole messy world his work refuses to seal off. His practice has always been about making with what’s there - leaves, ice, mud - and letting the environment collaborate, even sabotage. Stones are collaboration at its most unromantic.
There’s also a quiet theology of consequence here. Firing is transformation by heat, pressure, risk; you don’t get to “undo” it. By admitting the early firings were full of stones, he’s admitting the work was full of resistance - not just technical flaws, but the artist’s own unrefined intentions. The subtext is permission: the rough, obstructed beginnings aren’t a detour from the work. They’re the work, before it learned how to hold.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Andy
Add to List



