"The ease with which barley may be substituted directly for wheat in human food and its usefulness to replace wheat milling by-products as feed in the production of the milk supply render its abundant production important"
About this Quote
There is nothing lyrical here, and that is the point. Houston is writing in the dry, managerial dialect of early 20th-century governance, where a sentence can be as long as a supply chain and just as impersonal. The argument isn’t really about barley; it’s about control. By framing barley as an easy substitute for wheat not only in bread but across the “milk supply” via animal feed, he’s quietly selling resilience: if one staple falters, another can slot in with minimal cultural friction.
The specific intent is policy-legible persuasion. Houston, a major agricultural administrator in an era obsessed with “scientific” efficiency, is making the case that abundance is not merely desirable but strategically “important.” Notice the rhetorical trick: he never says “war,” “shortage,” or “panic,” but the logic is built for exactly those conditions. Substitution is crisis thinking dressed up as rational planning. “Ease” does a lot of work, implying the public won’t resist the swap and industry won’t stumble. It’s an appeal to practicality that doubles as a preemptive defense against dissent: if the replacement is easy, objections look irrational.
The subtext also reveals how food policy gets smuggled into national identity. Wheat is status; barley is the understudy. Houston elevates the understudy by routing the conversation through systems - milling by-products, feed rations, dairy output - so the consumer never has to confront the downgrade directly. This is the Progressive Era’s faith in technocracy: manage inputs, stabilize outputs, and call it prosperity.
The specific intent is policy-legible persuasion. Houston, a major agricultural administrator in an era obsessed with “scientific” efficiency, is making the case that abundance is not merely desirable but strategically “important.” Notice the rhetorical trick: he never says “war,” “shortage,” or “panic,” but the logic is built for exactly those conditions. Substitution is crisis thinking dressed up as rational planning. “Ease” does a lot of work, implying the public won’t resist the swap and industry won’t stumble. It’s an appeal to practicality that doubles as a preemptive defense against dissent: if the replacement is easy, objections look irrational.
The subtext also reveals how food policy gets smuggled into national identity. Wheat is status; barley is the understudy. Houston elevates the understudy by routing the conversation through systems - milling by-products, feed rations, dairy output - so the consumer never has to confront the downgrade directly. This is the Progressive Era’s faith in technocracy: manage inputs, stabilize outputs, and call it prosperity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Food |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List
