"The economy is too weak right now. We need to jump-start it. The American Jobs Act will provide that jump-start, to help us into next year and the year after that"
About this Quote
“Jump-start” is the tell: a metaphor built to make economic policy sound like basic, urgent maintenance. David Plouffe, a political operator speaking as a “public servant,” isn’t trying to win an academic debate about multipliers. He’s trying to shrink a messy macroeconomic moment into a problem with a tool you already trust. If the economy is a stalled car, then action is common sense and hesitation is negligence.
The specific intent is to create permission for immediate intervention without sounding ideological. “The economy is too weak right now” frames the situation as temporary but perilous, a dip that can be corrected with the right jolt. “We need to” shifts responsibility from a partisan agenda to a collective necessity, positioning opponents as people refusing to turn the key. Naming “The American Jobs Act” supplies a ready-made vessel for that urgency, branding policy as patriotism and work as the national religion.
The subtext is electoral and legislative at once. “Into next year and the year after that” quietly maps stimulus onto the political calendar: relief now, visible results later, a bridge over a period when voters will be judging competence. It also signals pragmatism to moderates: not a permanent expansion of government, just a short-term boost.
Context matters: post-recession stagnation, high unemployment, and a Congress allergic to big spending. Plouffe’s language preempts that allergy by promising a “jump-start,” not an overhaul - an intervention framed as temporary, targeted, and therefore, supposedly, not controversial.
The specific intent is to create permission for immediate intervention without sounding ideological. “The economy is too weak right now” frames the situation as temporary but perilous, a dip that can be corrected with the right jolt. “We need to” shifts responsibility from a partisan agenda to a collective necessity, positioning opponents as people refusing to turn the key. Naming “The American Jobs Act” supplies a ready-made vessel for that urgency, branding policy as patriotism and work as the national religion.
The subtext is electoral and legislative at once. “Into next year and the year after that” quietly maps stimulus onto the political calendar: relief now, visible results later, a bridge over a period when voters will be judging competence. It also signals pragmatism to moderates: not a permanent expansion of government, just a short-term boost.
Context matters: post-recession stagnation, high unemployment, and a Congress allergic to big spending. Plouffe’s language preempts that allergy by promising a “jump-start,” not an overhaul - an intervention framed as temporary, targeted, and therefore, supposedly, not controversial.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List
