"The efficiency of God may be understood as either creation or providence"
About this Quote
The line’s power is its forced choice that isn’t really a choice. “Either...or” reads like a tidy classification, yet the subtext is expansive: whatever you point to - the existence of the world, the unfolding of events, the seeming randomness of fortune - can be folded into God’s agency. This is theology trying to pre-empt the loopholes. If you concede creation but treat the rest as autonomous nature or human luck, Ames answers with providence. If you talk about providence but want to soften divine involvement in the material world, he yanks you back to creation.
Context matters: Ames is writing in a Reformed tradition anxious about rival explanations of causality - Catholic sacramental mediation, emerging mechanistic science, and the human tendency to cordon off “religion” to the private sphere. His phrasing is calm, systematic, almost legalistic, because the goal isn’t poetry; it’s jurisdiction. The sentence draws a boundary around reality and quietly posts a sign: nothing happens outside the divine remit.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Ames, William. (2026, January 18). The efficiency of God may be understood as either creation or providence. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-efficiency-of-god-may-be-understood-as-either-22860/
Chicago Style
Ames, William. "The efficiency of God may be understood as either creation or providence." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-efficiency-of-god-may-be-understood-as-either-22860/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The efficiency of God may be understood as either creation or providence." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-efficiency-of-god-may-be-understood-as-either-22860/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.







