"The election before us will be the Austerlitz of American politics"
About this Quote
Calling an election "the Austerlitz of American politics" is Conkling doing what 19th-century politicians did best: turning current events into battlefield myth, then daring the public to see themselves as history-makers. Austerlitz was Napoleon's masterpiece, a dazzling, decisive victory that reorganized Europe and humiliated rival powers. By borrowing that metaphor, Conkling isn't predicting a close contest. He's promising a rout that will reset the political map and settle arguments about legitimacy, leadership, and national direction.
The intent is both motivational and disciplinary. To allies, the line offers grandeur: vote not just to win, but to crown a new era. To fence-sitters and intraparty skeptics, it carries a warning: get in formation, because after this, there will be a clear victor and a long memory for who stood where. Conkling was a master of party machinery and patronage; the subtext is that power isn't merely won at the ballot box, it's consolidated afterward through loyalty tests.
Context matters. In the post-Civil War period, American politics was raw with factional conflict, regional resentment, and fierce struggles over Reconstruction, civil service, and the spoils system Conkling defended. Dressing an election up as Austerlitz flatters voters with epic stakes while normalizing hard-edged, winner-take-all politics. It suggests that democracy's messy negotiations are less admirable than decisive conquest - and that the point of the campaign is not compromise, but domination.
The intent is both motivational and disciplinary. To allies, the line offers grandeur: vote not just to win, but to crown a new era. To fence-sitters and intraparty skeptics, it carries a warning: get in formation, because after this, there will be a clear victor and a long memory for who stood where. Conkling was a master of party machinery and patronage; the subtext is that power isn't merely won at the ballot box, it's consolidated afterward through loyalty tests.
Context matters. In the post-Civil War period, American politics was raw with factional conflict, regional resentment, and fierce struggles over Reconstruction, civil service, and the spoils system Conkling defended. Dressing an election up as Austerlitz flatters voters with epic stakes while normalizing hard-edged, winner-take-all politics. It suggests that democracy's messy negotiations are less admirable than decisive conquest - and that the point of the campaign is not compromise, but domination.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Roscoe
Add to List



