"The Epistle to the Romans is an extremely important synthesis of the whole theology of St. Paul"
About this Quote
Calling Romans a "synthesis" is Kung tipping his hand about what kind of Christianity he thinks is worth defending: coherent, legible, and arguable in public. Romans isn’t just one Pauline letter among others; it’s the document where Paul sounds least like a pastor improvising for a messy local crisis and most like a theologian building a case. Law and grace, sin and justification, Israel and the nations, the inner mechanics of salvation and the social consequences of it all - Romans gives you the architecture. Kung’s adjective "extremely important" is understated Catholic rhetoric doing real work: it signals that if you want to understand Paul, you don’t start with inspirational fragments, you start with the hardest, most system-shaped text.
The subtext is also a warning about what happens when Romans is treated as a weapon. For centuries it’s been the book that turbocharged Augustine’s conversion narrative, then became the Protestant Reformation’s legal brief, then reappeared in modern debates about nationalism, election, and exclusion. Kung, a Catholic reformer who spent his career arguing with ecclesial authority and modern skepticism alike, is implicitly staking out a middle path: take Paul seriously as a thinker without letting a single interpretive tradition monopolize him.
Context matters here: Kung wrote in the wake of Vatican II’s renewed attention to Scripture and ecumenism. Calling Romans the synthesis is an invitation to common ground across confessional lines - but also an insistence that any renewed Christianity has to grapple with Paul at full strength, not as a mascot for whichever side is shouting loudest.
The subtext is also a warning about what happens when Romans is treated as a weapon. For centuries it’s been the book that turbocharged Augustine’s conversion narrative, then became the Protestant Reformation’s legal brief, then reappeared in modern debates about nationalism, election, and exclusion. Kung, a Catholic reformer who spent his career arguing with ecclesial authority and modern skepticism alike, is implicitly staking out a middle path: take Paul seriously as a thinker without letting a single interpretive tradition monopolize him.
Context matters here: Kung wrote in the wake of Vatican II’s renewed attention to Scripture and ecumenism. Calling Romans the synthesis is an invitation to common ground across confessional lines - but also an insistence that any renewed Christianity has to grapple with Paul at full strength, not as a mascot for whichever side is shouting loudest.
Quote Details
| Topic | Bible |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Hans
Add to List

