"The E.U. imports more agricultural goods from developing countries around the world than does the U.S., Canada and Japan, combined"
About this Quote
Bruton’s line is a diplomatic jab dressed up as a statistic: Europe, he implies, is the grown-up in the room on development, and everyone else is free-riding on moral posture. The choice of comparison countries is doing most of the work. The U.S., Canada, and Japan are rich democracies that often lecture about open markets and “helping” the Global South; bundling them together sets a high bar, then claims the E.U. still clears it. It’s not just a brag. It’s leverage.
The intent sits squarely in a recurring E.U. argument of the late-1990s/2000s: Europe should be seen as a leader in development policy, not merely as a protectionist bloc anchored by the Common Agricultural Policy. By foregrounding “imports” from developing countries, Bruton reframes trade as aid-by-other-means. He’s implicitly saying: judge us by what we buy, not what we pledge.
The subtext, though, is thornier. “Agricultural goods” sounds virtuous, but agriculture is where rich economies most aggressively defend their own producers through subsidies, quotas, and standards. Bruton’s statistic can be true while still leaving intact the critique that Europe’s rules shape which developing-country farmers get access, on what terms, and with how much value captured upstream by European processors and retailers. It’s a soft-power narrative: Europe as ethical consumer.
Context matters: Bruton, an Irish politician and former Taoiseach, comes from a country deeply entangled with E.U. farm policy. His formulation defends Europe’s trade posture without attacking the CAP outright. It’s a message aimed as much at European skeptics and WTO negotiators as at the “combined” outsiders: Europe is already contributing, so don’t single it out.
The intent sits squarely in a recurring E.U. argument of the late-1990s/2000s: Europe should be seen as a leader in development policy, not merely as a protectionist bloc anchored by the Common Agricultural Policy. By foregrounding “imports” from developing countries, Bruton reframes trade as aid-by-other-means. He’s implicitly saying: judge us by what we buy, not what we pledge.
The subtext, though, is thornier. “Agricultural goods” sounds virtuous, but agriculture is where rich economies most aggressively defend their own producers through subsidies, quotas, and standards. Bruton’s statistic can be true while still leaving intact the critique that Europe’s rules shape which developing-country farmers get access, on what terms, and with how much value captured upstream by European processors and retailers. It’s a soft-power narrative: Europe as ethical consumer.
Context matters: Bruton, an Irish politician and former Taoiseach, comes from a country deeply entangled with E.U. farm policy. His formulation defends Europe’s trade posture without attacking the CAP outright. It’s a message aimed as much at European skeptics and WTO negotiators as at the “combined” outsiders: Europe is already contributing, so don’t single it out.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
