"The fact remains; chauvinism is prevailing"
About this Quote
A clipped, almost weary diagnosis: not that chauvinism exists, but that it is winning. Bonino’s line works because it refuses the comforting language of “backlash” or “isolated incidents.” “The fact remains” is the politician’s equivalent of slamming a folder shut on the table: argument over, evidence on the record, deal with it. The semicolon does quiet rhetorical labor, turning what could be a slogan into a verdict.
Bonino has spent decades in the trenches of European liberal politics, where gender equality, migration, and civil liberties are routinely treated as negotiable extras when fear is a more convenient campaign tool. In that ecosystem, “chauvinism” is deliberately broad. It isn’t only sexism; it’s the whole posture of superiority - national, cultural, religious, masculine - that turns complexity into hierarchy. Using the term rather than naming a single target lets her indict a pattern: the rhetoric that shrinks rights into privileges and recasts pluralism as weakness.
The subtext is strategic urgency. “Prevailing” implies momentum, not permanence. It’s a warning about the political weather: if chauvinism is setting the agenda, then even people who claim to oppose it start adapting their language, softening commitments, triangulating. Bonino’s austerity here is the point. No inspirational uplift, no therapeutic reassurance, just a hard prompt to stop pretending the center will hold on autopilot. When a seasoned insider resorts to blunt finality, it signals a broader failure of institutions to translate egalitarian values into durable power.
Bonino has spent decades in the trenches of European liberal politics, where gender equality, migration, and civil liberties are routinely treated as negotiable extras when fear is a more convenient campaign tool. In that ecosystem, “chauvinism” is deliberately broad. It isn’t only sexism; it’s the whole posture of superiority - national, cultural, religious, masculine - that turns complexity into hierarchy. Using the term rather than naming a single target lets her indict a pattern: the rhetoric that shrinks rights into privileges and recasts pluralism as weakness.
The subtext is strategic urgency. “Prevailing” implies momentum, not permanence. It’s a warning about the political weather: if chauvinism is setting the agenda, then even people who claim to oppose it start adapting their language, softening commitments, triangulating. Bonino’s austerity here is the point. No inspirational uplift, no therapeutic reassurance, just a hard prompt to stop pretending the center will hold on autopilot. When a seasoned insider resorts to blunt finality, it signals a broader failure of institutions to translate egalitarian values into durable power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Emma
Add to List




