"The few bright meteors in man's intellectual horizon could well be matched by women, were she allowed to occupy the same elevated position"
About this Quote
Meteors are not steady stars; they flare, dazzle, and disappear, and Ernestine Rose knows exactly why that image bites. She’s writing into a 19th-century culture that congratulated itself on “great men” while quietly engineering the conditions that made their greatness legible: education, leisure, patronage, a public voice. By calling male intellectual icons “few bright meteors,” Rose punctures the myth of a naturally male-dominated genius class. Even on its own terms, she implies, the record is thin.
Her real maneuver is sharper than simple praise of women’s potential. The line “were she allowed to occupy the same elevated position” treats “elevation” as a social platform, not an inborn altitude. Genius isn’t a rare mineral found in male brains; it’s the outcome of access. The conditional “were she allowed” is the indictment: women’s absence from the canon is being misread as evidence of incapacity when it is, in fact, evidence of exclusion.
There’s also tactical restraint here. Rose doesn’t demand that women be “better” than men; she asks for a fair comparison, then calmly predicts the result. It’s argument as judo: accept the era’s obsession with exceptional minds, then flip it back on the gatekeepers. In a period when activists had to translate radical equality into language respectable audiences would entertain, Rose makes the radical sound obvious: remove the barriers, and the sky changes.
Her real maneuver is sharper than simple praise of women’s potential. The line “were she allowed to occupy the same elevated position” treats “elevation” as a social platform, not an inborn altitude. Genius isn’t a rare mineral found in male brains; it’s the outcome of access. The conditional “were she allowed” is the indictment: women’s absence from the canon is being misread as evidence of incapacity when it is, in fact, evidence of exclusion.
There’s also tactical restraint here. Rose doesn’t demand that women be “better” than men; she asks for a fair comparison, then calmly predicts the result. It’s argument as judo: accept the era’s obsession with exceptional minds, then flip it back on the gatekeepers. In a period when activists had to translate radical equality into language respectable audiences would entertain, Rose makes the radical sound obvious: remove the barriers, and the sky changes.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ernestine
Add to List

