"The final ballots represent players, managers, executives and builders who are top-tier candidates and worthy of review for consideration for election to the Hall of Fame"
About this Quote
The phrase "worthy of review" is doing the real work here, not the praise. Fay Vincent, a lawyer by trade and former baseball commissioner by circumstance, writes like someone building a procedural moat: nobody is being crowned, everyone is being processed. The sentence sounds celebratory, but its intent is managerial. It tells the public: trust the pipeline. The Hall of Fame isn’t a popularity contest, it’s an institution with filters, categories, and gatekeepers.
That’s the subtext: legitimacy comes from procedure. "Final ballots" implies a long narrowing, an administrative journey that’s already sorted the merely good from the "top-tier". Yet Vincent carefully avoids the word "deserving". He opts for "candidates" and "consideration", terms that keep the power with the voters and the institution, not the players. Even "builders" signals the Hall’s broader politics: this isn’t just about athletic greatness, it’s about who gets to be credited with shaping the sport, which is often where committees quietly reward executives and insiders.
Context matters because Hall of Fame debates are culture wars in miniature: stats vs. story, scandal vs. nostalgia, excellence vs. "character". Vincent’s line anticipates controversy by flattening it. If everyone on the ballot is "worthy", then any outcome can be framed as reasonable, not partisan or petty. It’s corporate reassurance in baseball diction: a promise that the brand (the Hall) remains more stable than the arguments swirling around it.
That’s the subtext: legitimacy comes from procedure. "Final ballots" implies a long narrowing, an administrative journey that’s already sorted the merely good from the "top-tier". Yet Vincent carefully avoids the word "deserving". He opts for "candidates" and "consideration", terms that keep the power with the voters and the institution, not the players. Even "builders" signals the Hall’s broader politics: this isn’t just about athletic greatness, it’s about who gets to be credited with shaping the sport, which is often where committees quietly reward executives and insiders.
Context matters because Hall of Fame debates are culture wars in miniature: stats vs. story, scandal vs. nostalgia, excellence vs. "character". Vincent’s line anticipates controversy by flattening it. If everyone on the ballot is "worthy", then any outcome can be framed as reasonable, not partisan or petty. It’s corporate reassurance in baseball diction: a promise that the brand (the Hall) remains more stable than the arguments swirling around it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|
More Quotes by Fay
Add to List


