"The first need of a free people is to define their own terms"
About this Quote
Power starts in the mouth: who gets to name things, and who gets named. Carmichael’s line lands like a strategic memo disguised as a moral truth. “The first need” is a deliberate escalation. Before marches, before legislation, before even coalition, he argues, a free people must seize language itself - because politics is built on the categories we treat as natural.
The operative word is “define.” Not “choose” or “use,” but define: to set boundaries, to decide what counts. In Carmichael’s world, the fight isn’t only against segregation or police violence; it’s against the grammatical structure of domination, where white institutions get to decide what “order,” “violence,” “extremism,” or even “integration” mean. If the state gets to define “riot,” it gets to justify repression. If the press defines “militant,” it gets to shrink legitimate anger into pathology. Language becomes a leash.
“Free people” carries its own sting. It implies that people denied the power to name their conditions aren’t fully free, regardless of constitutional rhetoric. That’s the subtext: liberation is not granted by recognition from above, it is practiced by self-determination from within.
Placed in the Black Power era - amid debates over “civil rights” versus “Black liberation,” “nonviolence” versus “self-defense,” and the constant media demand that Black activists speak in palatable tones - the quote reads as an insistence on epistemic sovereignty. Carmichael isn’t asking for better representation; he’s warning that if your opponent controls the dictionary, they control the battlefield.
The operative word is “define.” Not “choose” or “use,” but define: to set boundaries, to decide what counts. In Carmichael’s world, the fight isn’t only against segregation or police violence; it’s against the grammatical structure of domination, where white institutions get to decide what “order,” “violence,” “extremism,” or even “integration” mean. If the state gets to define “riot,” it gets to justify repression. If the press defines “militant,” it gets to shrink legitimate anger into pathology. Language becomes a leash.
“Free people” carries its own sting. It implies that people denied the power to name their conditions aren’t fully free, regardless of constitutional rhetoric. That’s the subtext: liberation is not granted by recognition from above, it is practiced by self-determination from within.
Placed in the Black Power era - amid debates over “civil rights” versus “Black liberation,” “nonviolence” versus “self-defense,” and the constant media demand that Black activists speak in palatable tones - the quote reads as an insistence on epistemic sovereignty. Carmichael isn’t asking for better representation; he’s warning that if your opponent controls the dictionary, they control the battlefield.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Stokely
Add to List
