"The first object of my endeavours was the means to become perfect and happy"
About this Quote
A mathematician declaring that his first project was "the means to become perfect and happy" sounds, on the surface, like a private self-help motto. In Lambert's 18th-century world, it reads more like a research program. The key word is "means": not perfection as a mystical state, but as something engineered, stepwise, and testable. It is the voice of a man trained to distrust inspiration and instead ask what procedures, habits, and proofs could reliably produce a better life.
Lambert sits in that Enlightenment sweet spot where moral life and scientific method still share a border. The era is obsessed with systems: classify nature, rationalize politics, codify taste, discipline the self. So "endeavours" signals more than ambition; it suggests sustained labor, the daily grind of improvement. And "perfect" isn't necessarily vanity. In mathematical speech, perfection is about completeness, consistency, removing contradiction. Apply that to the self and you get the subtext: happiness is not a mood but a consequence of order.
There's also a tension hidden in the pairing. Happiness is unruly; perfection is strict. Lambert's line tries to reconcile them by treating happiness as something that can be stabilized by method. That aspiration feels modern in the most double-edged way: the promise that life can be optimized, and the anxiety that if you're not happy, you simply haven't found the right technique yet. Lambert isn't preaching bliss. He's admitting an Enlightenment faith that the self, like a theorem, can be made to come out clean.
Lambert sits in that Enlightenment sweet spot where moral life and scientific method still share a border. The era is obsessed with systems: classify nature, rationalize politics, codify taste, discipline the self. So "endeavours" signals more than ambition; it suggests sustained labor, the daily grind of improvement. And "perfect" isn't necessarily vanity. In mathematical speech, perfection is about completeness, consistency, removing contradiction. Apply that to the self and you get the subtext: happiness is not a mood but a consequence of order.
There's also a tension hidden in the pairing. Happiness is unruly; perfection is strict. Lambert's line tries to reconcile them by treating happiness as something that can be stabilized by method. That aspiration feels modern in the most double-edged way: the promise that life can be optimized, and the anxiety that if you're not happy, you simply haven't found the right technique yet. Lambert isn't preaching bliss. He's admitting an Enlightenment faith that the self, like a theorem, can be made to come out clean.
Quote Details
| Topic | Self-Improvement |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Johann
Add to List





