"The first resistance to social change is to say it's not necessary"
About this Quote
The cleanest way to stall a revolution is to dispute its urgency. Steinem’s line captures a familiar maneuver in American life: opposition that won’t admit it’s opposition. Instead of arguing openly against women’s liberation, civil rights, queer equality, or labor power, the gatekeeper move is procedural and paternal: nothing needs fixing, so agitation is theatrics.
The intent is tactical and diagnostic. Steinem isn’t merely describing denial; she’s naming it as the opening bid in a negotiation over power. “Not necessary” pretends to be neutral, even reasonable, as if social arrangements are default settings rather than contested systems. That phrasing also smuggles in a moral judgment: if change isn’t necessary, those demanding it must be impatient, hysterical, divisive, or ungrateful. The burden shifts from institutions to individuals. Prove your pain. Produce the data. Wait your turn.
The subtext is that necessity is never evenly distributed. For people insulated by privilege, injustice can feel like background noise; for those living it, it’s a daily tax. Steinem’s brilliance is how she frames resistance as an affect - a preference for comfort and continuity - rather than a set of arguments. Once you see that, the pattern repeats everywhere: “Do we really need this?” becomes the velvet rope guarding the status quo.
Contextually, it lands in Steinem’s era of second-wave feminism and ongoing backlash cycles, but it also reads like a manual for the present. The first “no” rarely sounds like “no.” It sounds like “why now?” and hopes you’ll tire before you answer.
The intent is tactical and diagnostic. Steinem isn’t merely describing denial; she’s naming it as the opening bid in a negotiation over power. “Not necessary” pretends to be neutral, even reasonable, as if social arrangements are default settings rather than contested systems. That phrasing also smuggles in a moral judgment: if change isn’t necessary, those demanding it must be impatient, hysterical, divisive, or ungrateful. The burden shifts from institutions to individuals. Prove your pain. Produce the data. Wait your turn.
The subtext is that necessity is never evenly distributed. For people insulated by privilege, injustice can feel like background noise; for those living it, it’s a daily tax. Steinem’s brilliance is how she frames resistance as an affect - a preference for comfort and continuity - rather than a set of arguments. Once you see that, the pattern repeats everywhere: “Do we really need this?” becomes the velvet rope guarding the status quo.
Contextually, it lands in Steinem’s era of second-wave feminism and ongoing backlash cycles, but it also reads like a manual for the present. The first “no” rarely sounds like “no.” It sounds like “why now?” and hopes you’ll tire before you answer.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Gloria
Add to List




