"The first two missions have some test objectives, some new capabilities that we're going to try to develop on orbit to possibly be used on later flights"
About this Quote
Spoken like a man trying to make risk sound like a checklist. The line is all engineered modesty: “some test objectives,” “some new capabilities,” “possibly,” “later flights.” Every hedge is doing double duty. It keeps expectations realistic (no one wants a headline that reads “bold new tech fails in space”), while quietly selling ambition to funders, partners, and a public that’s been trained to ask what space is “for.”
The intent is practical: frame early missions as learning platforms, not performance art. “Develop on orbit” is the key phrase. It normalizes the idea that you don’t just launch finished inventions anymore; you iterate in space itself, treating orbit like a lab bench. That’s a modern shift in aerospace culture, closer to Silicon Valley’s beta-testing ethos than the old NASA-era image of perfect, one-and-done hardware.
The subtext is reassurance through process. By calling the first two flights “test” missions, Kelly implicitly asks for patience with imperfect outcomes while signaling competence: there is a plan, there are objectives, there will be incremental proof. “Possibly be used on later flights” also smuggles in a bigger promise: a pipeline. Success isn’t a single heroic mission; it’s an accumulating capability that makes the next mission cheaper, safer, or more daring.
Contextually, it’s the language of a space economy trying to feel inevitable. Not grand destiny, not sci-fi romance - an upgrade path. That’s how you build public trust in an enterprise where failure is spectacular and success is, by necessity, methodical.
The intent is practical: frame early missions as learning platforms, not performance art. “Develop on orbit” is the key phrase. It normalizes the idea that you don’t just launch finished inventions anymore; you iterate in space itself, treating orbit like a lab bench. That’s a modern shift in aerospace culture, closer to Silicon Valley’s beta-testing ethos than the old NASA-era image of perfect, one-and-done hardware.
The subtext is reassurance through process. By calling the first two flights “test” missions, Kelly implicitly asks for patience with imperfect outcomes while signaling competence: there is a plan, there are objectives, there will be incremental proof. “Possibly be used on later flights” also smuggles in a bigger promise: a pipeline. Success isn’t a single heroic mission; it’s an accumulating capability that makes the next mission cheaper, safer, or more daring.
Contextually, it’s the language of a space economy trying to feel inevitable. Not grand destiny, not sci-fi romance - an upgrade path. That’s how you build public trust in an enterprise where failure is spectacular and success is, by necessity, methodical.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List





