"The focus should not be on talking. Talk is cheap. It must be on action"
About this Quote
“Talk is cheap” is the kind of blunt moral accounting politicians reach for when they want to reset the terms of judgment. Howard Berman’s line doesn’t just scold empty rhetoric; it tries to reclaim credibility in a profession widely suspected of mistaking press releases for progress. The phrasing is deliberately transactional: “cheap” implies low cost, low risk, low commitment. By contrast, “action” is positioned as the scarce commodity, the thing that supposedly carries consequences and therefore deserves trust.
The specific intent is to move the audience’s evaluative lens away from promises, speeches, and partisan messaging and toward measurable outcomes: votes cast, bills passed, resources delivered, harms prevented. It’s also a defensive maneuver. When a politician says this, he’s not only criticizing others’ performative outrage or virtue signaling; he’s implicitly asking for patience and authority: let the process work, judge me by results, and stop treating language as policy.
The subtext is more complicated. Politicians traffic in talk for a living; disclaiming it can be a way to launder that dependence, to sound like an outsider while operating as an insider. It also narrows the debate. “Action” sounds self-evidently good, but action without transparency can mean dealmaking, coercion, or haste. The line pressures opponents to either deliver instantly or be branded unserious, and it flatters constituents who are exhausted by “gridlock” narratives.
Contextually, this reads like a Washington admonition: in moments of crisis, scandal, or legislative stalemate, the quickest path to public legitimacy is to promise movement. The quote works because it converts frustration into a simple ethic: do something, not just say something.
The specific intent is to move the audience’s evaluative lens away from promises, speeches, and partisan messaging and toward measurable outcomes: votes cast, bills passed, resources delivered, harms prevented. It’s also a defensive maneuver. When a politician says this, he’s not only criticizing others’ performative outrage or virtue signaling; he’s implicitly asking for patience and authority: let the process work, judge me by results, and stop treating language as policy.
The subtext is more complicated. Politicians traffic in talk for a living; disclaiming it can be a way to launder that dependence, to sound like an outsider while operating as an insider. It also narrows the debate. “Action” sounds self-evidently good, but action without transparency can mean dealmaking, coercion, or haste. The line pressures opponents to either deliver instantly or be branded unserious, and it flatters constituents who are exhausted by “gridlock” narratives.
Contextually, this reads like a Washington admonition: in moments of crisis, scandal, or legislative stalemate, the quickest path to public legitimacy is to promise movement. The quote works because it converts frustration into a simple ethic: do something, not just say something.
Quote Details
| Topic | Motivational |
|---|
More Quotes by Howard
Add to List









