"The genius of the economic machine is in its ability to convert these indulgences into profitability. It converts desire into attention, a grip on our eyeballs and eardrums, which in turn can be marketed to advertisers"
About this Quote
Calling capitalism a "machine" isn’t just a metaphor here; it’s an accusation about design. Gitlin frames the economy less as a neutral arena of exchange than as an engineered apparatus that metabolizes our "indulgences" into revenue. The word choice matters: indulgence suggests something private, even slightly shameful, the stuff we’d like to imagine belongs to us alone. His point is that the system’s genius lies in making that fantasy impossible. Nothing stays merely personal once it can be captured, quantified, and sold.
The pivot from "desire" to "attention" is the tell. Desire is messy and human; attention is measurable, tradable, and scalable. In that conversion, people stop being customers in the old sense and become raw material: eyeballs and eardrums, bodily commodities. Gitlin’s blunt physicality is doing rhetorical work. It strips away the romance of "content" and "connection" and replaces it with the image of a literal grip, suggesting coercion masquerading as choice.
Contextually, this lands in the lineage of late-20th-century media critique that anticipated the attention economy’s present reality: platforms engineered for compulsion, advertising as the hidden buyer, and culture as a pipeline feeding analytics. The subtext isn’t that pleasure is bad; it’s that pleasure has been professionally weaponized. What looks like indulgence becomes labor performed for free, with advertisers as the ultimate client and our inner lives as the supply chain.
The pivot from "desire" to "attention" is the tell. Desire is messy and human; attention is measurable, tradable, and scalable. In that conversion, people stop being customers in the old sense and become raw material: eyeballs and eardrums, bodily commodities. Gitlin’s blunt physicality is doing rhetorical work. It strips away the romance of "content" and "connection" and replaces it with the image of a literal grip, suggesting coercion masquerading as choice.
Contextually, this lands in the lineage of late-20th-century media critique that anticipated the attention economy’s present reality: platforms engineered for compulsion, advertising as the hidden buyer, and culture as a pipeline feeding analytics. The subtext isn’t that pleasure is bad; it’s that pleasure has been professionally weaponized. What looks like indulgence becomes labor performed for free, with advertisers as the ultimate client and our inner lives as the supply chain.
Quote Details
| Topic | Marketing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Todd
Add to List




