"The global response to global terrorism must not endanger fundamental human rights and freedoms"
About this Quote
The line is built like a warning label: necessary, plainspoken, and easy to ignore until something goes wrong. Mesic, a Balkan statesman shaped by the wreckage of Yugoslavia and the hard-won mechanics of post-conflict democracy, isn’t offering an abstract civics lesson. He’s drawing a boundary around the one thing that “global” panic reliably tries to dissolve: limits on power.
The phrasing does quiet rhetorical work. “Global response” sounds coordinated, responsible, modern. It also smuggles in the temptation of exceptionalism at scale: if the threat is borderless, then the measures can be, too. Mesic counters with “must not,” a moral imperative that refuses the usual security-state trade-off language. He’s not bargaining with rights; he’s insisting they’re non-negotiable.
The subtext is aimed at the post-9/11 era, when governments rushed to expand surveillance, detention, and executive discretion, often with public approval and minimal oversight. Mesic’s point isn’t that terrorism is overblown; it’s that counterterrorism can become its own kind of contagion, normalizing emergency tools that outlive the emergency. “Fundamental human rights and freedoms” is deliberately broad, a catch-all that covers the obvious (due process, speech, privacy) and the politically inconvenient (the rights of suspects, migrants, minorities).
Coming from a leader associated with a region where “security” has been used to justify repression, the sentence reads as both principle and memory: democracies don’t usually collapse in a single coup; they erode through permissions granted in fear. Mesic is asking the world to fight terrorism without borrowing its logic.
The phrasing does quiet rhetorical work. “Global response” sounds coordinated, responsible, modern. It also smuggles in the temptation of exceptionalism at scale: if the threat is borderless, then the measures can be, too. Mesic counters with “must not,” a moral imperative that refuses the usual security-state trade-off language. He’s not bargaining with rights; he’s insisting they’re non-negotiable.
The subtext is aimed at the post-9/11 era, when governments rushed to expand surveillance, detention, and executive discretion, often with public approval and minimal oversight. Mesic’s point isn’t that terrorism is overblown; it’s that counterterrorism can become its own kind of contagion, normalizing emergency tools that outlive the emergency. “Fundamental human rights and freedoms” is deliberately broad, a catch-all that covers the obvious (due process, speech, privacy) and the politically inconvenient (the rights of suspects, migrants, minorities).
Coming from a leader associated with a region where “security” has been used to justify repression, the sentence reads as both principle and memory: democracies don’t usually collapse in a single coup; they erode through permissions granted in fear. Mesic is asking the world to fight terrorism without borrowing its logic.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Stjepan
Add to List



