"The goal to strive for is a poor government but a rich people"
About this Quote
“The goal to strive for is a poor government but a rich people” is the kind of line that flatters taxpayers while quietly handcuffing the state. Coming from Andrew Johnson, a president who inherited the wreckage of the Civil War and then fought Reconstruction at nearly every turn, it’s less a budget note than a governing philosophy: keep federal power lean, keep citizens (or at least the ones you recognize as full citizens) prosperous, and treat the machinery of public authority as a potential threat.
The phrasing does a neat rhetorical trick. “Poor government” sounds like humility, even virtue: no bloated bureaucracy, no meddling, no imperial Washington. But “poor” here doesn’t mean incompetent; it means constrained. It implies that the best government is one that can’t do much to you or for you. That subtext matters in Johnson’s context, where a “rich people” was not an abstract public but a society in the middle of defining who counted as “the people” at all. A thin federal government in 1865-1875 wasn’t neutral. It was a choice that left power with states, local elites, and the old order’s muscle.
The quote also presumes wealth trickles up from private life when government steps back, an early echo of the American habit of equating public austerity with personal freedom. Yet Reconstruction exposed the contradiction: a nation trying to rebuild and secure rights needed an empowered state. Johnson’s ideal of government “poverty” reads, in retrospect, like a moral alibi for political retreat.
The phrasing does a neat rhetorical trick. “Poor government” sounds like humility, even virtue: no bloated bureaucracy, no meddling, no imperial Washington. But “poor” here doesn’t mean incompetent; it means constrained. It implies that the best government is one that can’t do much to you or for you. That subtext matters in Johnson’s context, where a “rich people” was not an abstract public but a society in the middle of defining who counted as “the people” at all. A thin federal government in 1865-1875 wasn’t neutral. It was a choice that left power with states, local elites, and the old order’s muscle.
The quote also presumes wealth trickles up from private life when government steps back, an early echo of the American habit of equating public austerity with personal freedom. Yet Reconstruction exposed the contradiction: a nation trying to rebuild and secure rights needed an empowered state. Johnson’s ideal of government “poverty” reads, in retrospect, like a moral alibi for political retreat.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wealth |
|---|
More Quotes by Andrew
Add to List
