"The great difference between screen acting and theatre acting is that screen acting is about reacting - 75% of the time, great screen actors are great reactors"
About this Quote
Roeg is quietly dismantling the old, chest-thumping mythology of acting as performance. On stage, the actor has to project: to carve emotion big enough to reach the back row, to sustain a character through time in front of a live audience that can feel any drop in energy. Film, Roeg argues, runs on a different electricity. The camera isn’t impressed by output; it’s fascinated by intake. It watches the instant something lands on a face, the micro-adjustment in the eyes, the half-second of calculation before a line is spoken. “Reacting” isn’t passive here. It’s craft at the speed of thought.
The 75% is a director’s provocation, not a statistic: a way to recalibrate where the real work happens. In cinema, the most revealing moment often belongs to the listener. Cutaways, close-ups, and the tyranny of editing make reaction the primary unit of meaning. A great reactor gives editors options, gives scenes oxygen, and makes other actors better by making them feel heard. It’s also a gentle warning against “acting” as display. If theatre can reward command, film punishes it; the lens catches self-consciousness like sweat.
Roeg’s context matters. His films (Don’t Look Now, The Man Who Fell to Earth) thrive on fragmentation, suggestion, and psychological afterimage. In that kind of cinema, reaction becomes narrative: the story is what registers, what’s withheld, what’s almost understood. He’s advocating for a modern screen presence where interior life is the spectacle, and restraint is the loudest thing you can do.
The 75% is a director’s provocation, not a statistic: a way to recalibrate where the real work happens. In cinema, the most revealing moment often belongs to the listener. Cutaways, close-ups, and the tyranny of editing make reaction the primary unit of meaning. A great reactor gives editors options, gives scenes oxygen, and makes other actors better by making them feel heard. It’s also a gentle warning against “acting” as display. If theatre can reward command, film punishes it; the lens catches self-consciousness like sweat.
Roeg’s context matters. His films (Don’t Look Now, The Man Who Fell to Earth) thrive on fragmentation, suggestion, and psychological afterimage. In that kind of cinema, reaction becomes narrative: the story is what registers, what’s withheld, what’s almost understood. He’s advocating for a modern screen presence where interior life is the spectacle, and restraint is the loudest thing you can do.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Nicolas
Add to List
