"The great mass of humanity should never learn to read or write"
About this Quote
A deliberately incendiary line from D. H. Lawrence, it distills his deep suspicion of modernity’s cult of the printed word. Lawrence, a working-class novelist who rose by means of books, came to believe that mass literacy, yoked to industrial capitalism and the nation-state, did not liberate people so much as regiment them. He distrusted what he called the triumph of the mind over the blood: abstract, standardized thinking imposed on the quick of instinct, sensation, and intimate relation. Schools churned out readers and clerks; newspapers and pulp ephemera fed readers with slogans; the new mass audience consumed words while losing touch with lived experience.
The provocation aims less at literacy itself than at its mass deployment. When everyone reads in the same way, under the same institutional pressures, reading becomes a vector for conformity and manipulation. The printed word can hypnotize, turning individuals into a crowd susceptible to propaganda, moral panics, and mechanized feeling. Lawrence wanted reading to be rare in a qualitative sense: not scarce, but alive, dangerous, and transformative, an art of contact that reconnects mind to the body’s deeper knowing. His rhetoric exaggerates to make the point that mere literacy, detached from inner vitality, can deaden rather than awaken.
There is an unmistakable elitist, even authoritarian, edge here. Lawrence’s work often flirts with the idea of strong leaders and organic communities, and his disdain for mass taste sits uneasily beside the democratizing promise of education. The paradox is sharp: a writer whose life was made possible by literacy denouncing the spread of reading. Yet the discomfort is part of the insight. The line exposes a modern contradiction: education can either enlarge freedom or become a tool of social control. Read as a warning, it asks whether the culture of reading we promote intensifies human life or flattens it into habits, routines, and ready-made opinions. Lawrence’s challenge is to make words answer to the pulse of being, not to the machinery of the crowd.
The provocation aims less at literacy itself than at its mass deployment. When everyone reads in the same way, under the same institutional pressures, reading becomes a vector for conformity and manipulation. The printed word can hypnotize, turning individuals into a crowd susceptible to propaganda, moral panics, and mechanized feeling. Lawrence wanted reading to be rare in a qualitative sense: not scarce, but alive, dangerous, and transformative, an art of contact that reconnects mind to the body’s deeper knowing. His rhetoric exaggerates to make the point that mere literacy, detached from inner vitality, can deaden rather than awaken.
There is an unmistakable elitist, even authoritarian, edge here. Lawrence’s work often flirts with the idea of strong leaders and organic communities, and his disdain for mass taste sits uneasily beside the democratizing promise of education. The paradox is sharp: a writer whose life was made possible by literacy denouncing the spread of reading. Yet the discomfort is part of the insight. The line exposes a modern contradiction: education can either enlarge freedom or become a tool of social control. Read as a warning, it asks whether the culture of reading we promote intensifies human life or flattens it into habits, routines, and ready-made opinions. Lawrence’s challenge is to make words answer to the pulse of being, not to the machinery of the crowd.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List
