"The greater part of critics are parasites, who, if nothing had been written, would find nothing to write"
About this Quote
The subtext is a defensive writer’s creed: the maker is primary, the judge is secondary, and the judge’s authority is suspicious precisely because it arrives after the fact. Priestley’s phrasing also sneaks in a class critique: critics as middlemen, professional tastemakers who can’t (or won’t) risk the vulnerability of making the thing itself. It’s a swipe at a cultural ecosystem where reputations can be made by dismissal, and where cleverness sometimes masquerades as insight.
Context matters. Priestley wrote in a Britain thick with newspaper reviews and highbrow gatekeeping, and he lived through eras when critics could tank a play on opening night or canonize a novelist by fiat. The line reads like a preemptive strike: not merely anger at bad reviews, but a bid to delegitimize the tribunal. Its potency comes from how it flatters artists while needling everyone who’s ever confused proximity to art with participation in it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Priestley, J.B. (2026, January 18). The greater part of critics are parasites, who, if nothing had been written, would find nothing to write. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-greater-part-of-critics-are-parasites-who-if-7541/
Chicago Style
Priestley, J.B. "The greater part of critics are parasites, who, if nothing had been written, would find nothing to write." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-greater-part-of-critics-are-parasites-who-if-7541/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The greater part of critics are parasites, who, if nothing had been written, would find nothing to write." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-greater-part-of-critics-are-parasites-who-if-7541/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.










