"The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist"
About this Quote
Friedman’s line works because it smuggles a hard truth into the sleek language of economics: markets are not self-sustaining fairy tales. By grafting Adam Smith’s almost-mystical "invisible hand" onto the blunt image of a "hidden fist", he exposes what polite globalization talk often launders away - coercion. The rhyme and symmetry make it feel like a proverb, but the bite is in the reversal: the market’s seeming spontaneity is revealed as an outcome that has to be policed, protected, and sometimes imposed.
The intent is less to celebrate force than to puncture naivete. In Friedman’s world - the post-Cold War, WTO-era, "Golden Arches" heyday when American policymakers sold free trade as destiny - the missing premise was power. Supply chains don’t just appear; sea lanes stay open because navies patrol them. Contracts don’t enforce themselves; states do. Even the basic conditions for investment - property rights, stable currencies, predictable rules - are political achievements backed by credible threat.
Subtextually, the "hidden" part matters as much as the fist. Friedman isn’t describing overt empire with flags and colonies. He’s naming a subtler arrangement in which force is kept offstage so the story can remain about choice, efficiency, and progress. That’s why the line still lands: it captures the uneasy bargain at the core of globalization, where the freedom to buy and sell often depends on someone else’s capacity to intimidate, intervene, and, if necessary, break things.
The intent is less to celebrate force than to puncture naivete. In Friedman’s world - the post-Cold War, WTO-era, "Golden Arches" heyday when American policymakers sold free trade as destiny - the missing premise was power. Supply chains don’t just appear; sea lanes stay open because navies patrol them. Contracts don’t enforce themselves; states do. Even the basic conditions for investment - property rights, stable currencies, predictable rules - are political achievements backed by credible threat.
Subtextually, the "hidden" part matters as much as the fist. Friedman isn’t describing overt empire with flags and colonies. He’s naming a subtler arrangement in which force is kept offstage so the story can remain about choice, efficiency, and progress. That’s why the line still lands: it captures the uneasy bargain at the core of globalization, where the freedom to buy and sell often depends on someone else’s capacity to intimidate, intervene, and, if necessary, break things.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List
