"The idea of being in the State Department was exciting. On the other hand, I always had in the back of my mind going into politics. If I stayed in Washington, I might end up a government hack"

Elliot Richardson's quote reflects the internal conflict often experienced by people working within or considering a profession in federal government. His words shed light on the appeal and possible drawbacks of being associated with governmental functions, specifically in Washington, D.C., a city associated with American political power.

At first, Richardson acknowledges the enjoyment connected with operating in the State Department. This sentiment likely stems from the prestige, influence, and worldwide impact that such a position might offer. The State Department is main to shaping and implementing U.S. foreign policy, and hence, functions within it can provide a sense of purpose and importance, providing opportunities to engage with crucial global concerns and add to the country's tactical decisions.

However, Richardson juxtaposes this interest with an individual aspiration to delve into politics. This exposes a more extensive desire to effect change and maybe suggests that while department roles use impact, they may not provide the exact same public visibility or direct decision-making power that features chosen workplace. The "back of my mind" recommends that this political ambition was a relentless undercurrent in his profession factors to consider, showing a deeper calling that went beyond governmental or diplomatic responsibilities.

The term "federal government hack" presents an important perspective, showing Richardson's issue about perhaps becoming entrenched in the governmental system. Being labeled a "hack" suggests becoming so entrenched in the regular procedures and compromise that he may surrender development, passion, or personal ideals. This part of the quote acknowledges a worry of stagnation and mediocrity, where the vibrant and impactful nature of governmental work could be eclipsed by bureaucratic inertia or political conformity.

In general, Richardson's words encapsulate a balancing act in between the immediate chances within the structure of federal government service and the more comprehensive, personal goals for political impact and tradition, moderated by a worry of becoming a plain entity within the huge governmental maker.