"The importance of certain problems concerning the facts will be inherent in the structure of the system"
About this Quote
Parsons is doing a very Parsons thing here: smuggling a whole philosophy of knowledge into a sentence that sounds like it was engineered to resist quotation. The key move is “inherent in the structure of the system.” He’s not saying problems become important because journalists, voters, or even researchers decide they are. He’s saying importance is baked into the architecture of the social order itself - and that the right kind of sociological theory can read that architecture.
The intent is methodological and disciplinary. Mid-century American sociology was trying to look like a hard science without pretending humans are molecules. Parsons’s structural functionalism answers that ambition by treating society as a system with interdependent parts, where “facts” aren’t just raw observations but elements that matter differently depending on how the system holds together. Certain empirical questions will keep reappearing not because scholars are obsessed, but because the system produces pressures, contradictions, and coordination problems that demand attention.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to both naïve empiricism and purely voluntarist accounts of social life. If you think facts speak for themselves, Parsons says: no, their significance is patterned. If you think social change is just the sum of individual choices, he says: choices are constrained by roles, norms, and institutions that pre-sort what counts as a “problem.”
Context matters: Parsons is writing in the shadow of the Great Depression, World War II, and the rise of large bureaucratic states - eras when “system” stopped being metaphor and started feeling like lived reality. The line is bloodless on purpose: it claims authority by sounding inevitable.
The intent is methodological and disciplinary. Mid-century American sociology was trying to look like a hard science without pretending humans are molecules. Parsons’s structural functionalism answers that ambition by treating society as a system with interdependent parts, where “facts” aren’t just raw observations but elements that matter differently depending on how the system holds together. Certain empirical questions will keep reappearing not because scholars are obsessed, but because the system produces pressures, contradictions, and coordination problems that demand attention.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to both naïve empiricism and purely voluntarist accounts of social life. If you think facts speak for themselves, Parsons says: no, their significance is patterned. If you think social change is just the sum of individual choices, he says: choices are constrained by roles, norms, and institutions that pre-sort what counts as a “problem.”
Context matters: Parsons is writing in the shadow of the Great Depression, World War II, and the rise of large bureaucratic states - eras when “system” stopped being metaphor and started feeling like lived reality. The line is bloodless on purpose: it claims authority by sounding inevitable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Talcott
Add to List