"The intellectual is different from the ordinary man, but only in certain sections of his personality, and even then not all the time"

George Orwell’s observation on the intellectual highlights the subtle and sometimes temporary distinctions between those deemed as intellectuals and the so-called ordinary people. Rather than positioning the intellectual as a wholly different type of human, he suggests that the gap is not fundamental or all-encompassing, but appears in specific parts of personality and only under certain conditions. This perspective challenges any notion of a rigid elite with a separate psychological makeup, inviting a more nuanced understanding of human variation.

Intellectuals, according to Orwell, possess qualities or habits of mind that distinguish them at particular moments, perhaps in their analytical approach, critical thinking, or engagement with abstract ideas. These moments do not necessarily define their entire character; outside these spheres, the intellectual may think and feel in ways entirely similar to others. For example, an academic may apply rigorous skepticism and methodical reasoning when discussing philosophical questions, yet respond with ordinary emotion and instinct when faced with personal matters or daily routines.

Such compartmentalization suggests that intellect functions more as a role or a set of behaviors rather than a constant identity. The boundaries between intellectual and ordinary are therefore porous and situational. Anyone might display intellectual tendencies in some domains and not in others. Moreover, this view democratizes the concept of intellect, making it accessible and dynamic rather than innate and exclusive.

By emphasizing that the differences are confined to “certain sections of his personality, and even then not all the time,” Orwell points toward a common humanity, proposing that intellectualism is a matter of degree and circumstance. It invites humility in those regarded as intellectuals and recognition of latent potential in everyone. This undermines both elitism among intellectuals and resignation among the populace, making the realm of ideas more inclusive and the assessment of people more charitable.