"The intellectuals' chief cause of anguish are one another's works"
About this Quote
Intellectual life likes to posture as a noble search for truth, but Barzun punctures it as something closer to an endless, anxious peer-review session. “The intellectuals’ chief cause of anguish are one another’s works” flips the expected villain. Not censorship, not mass culture, not politics, but the rival book on the nightstand. The sting comes from how plausible it feels: if you’ve staked your identity on being the person who sees furthest, the worst news is that someone else has already seen it, phrased it better, or made your framework look provincial.
Barzun, an educator who watched ideas turn into careers, is diagnosing a professional ecosystem. Works are not just texts; they’re status bids. A new essay can rearrange the pecking order, exposing stale assumptions, poaching your audience, or forcing you to revise the story you tell about your own originality. “Anguish” is doing heavy lifting here: it suggests a private, almost bodily panic rather than mere disagreement. The subtext is that the marketplace of ideas runs on jealousy as much as curiosity, and that “critique” often masks self-defense.
There’s also a quiet jab at the myth of the embattled intellectual as heroic outsider. Barzun implies the most intense pressure comes from inside the guild: the canon, the journals, the conference circuit, the fear of being footnoted into irrelevance. It works because it’s not anti-intellectual; it’s anti-romantic. He’s describing how ambition, competition, and the hunger to matter can distort even the highest-minded work.
Barzun, an educator who watched ideas turn into careers, is diagnosing a professional ecosystem. Works are not just texts; they’re status bids. A new essay can rearrange the pecking order, exposing stale assumptions, poaching your audience, or forcing you to revise the story you tell about your own originality. “Anguish” is doing heavy lifting here: it suggests a private, almost bodily panic rather than mere disagreement. The subtext is that the marketplace of ideas runs on jealousy as much as curiosity, and that “critique” often masks self-defense.
There’s also a quiet jab at the myth of the embattled intellectual as heroic outsider. Barzun implies the most intense pressure comes from inside the guild: the canon, the journals, the conference circuit, the fear of being footnoted into irrelevance. It works because it’s not anti-intellectual; it’s anti-romantic. He’s describing how ambition, competition, and the hunger to matter can distort even the highest-minded work.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jacques
Add to List







