"The intelligence of the lower forms of animal life, like a great deal of human intelligence, does not involve a self"
About this Quote
Mead slips the knife in with a calm philosopher’s smile: plenty of what we praise as “intelligence” isn’t the lofty, inner-minded thing we pretend it is. Animals can navigate, hunt, learn routines, even solve problems, yet Mead says that competence doesn’t automatically equal a “self.” He’s not denying animal cognition so much as policing a boundary: the self is not mere processing power. It’s a social achievement.
The sting is in the clause “like a great deal of human intelligence.” Mead is taking aim at the flattering myth that humans are always self-aware agents steering the ship. Much of our day-to-day cleverness runs on habit, reflex, trained response, and environmental cues. We can be brilliant in the same way a well-designed mechanism is brilliant: effective, adaptive, and largely unreflective. That’s the subtextual demotion. He’s downgrading a huge portion of “human intelligence” to the level of skill without inner narration.
Context matters. Mead, a founder of pragmatism and symbolic interactionism, built his theory of mind around communication and role-taking: the self forms when an organism can see itself from the standpoint of others, using shared symbols (language, gestures, norms). So the line functions as a wedge against Cartesian-style assumptions that mind and self are private substances. Intelligence can be individual; the self, for Mead, is relational. The quote works because it reframes selfhood as a public, social technology - and quietly suggests how often humans operate without it.
The sting is in the clause “like a great deal of human intelligence.” Mead is taking aim at the flattering myth that humans are always self-aware agents steering the ship. Much of our day-to-day cleverness runs on habit, reflex, trained response, and environmental cues. We can be brilliant in the same way a well-designed mechanism is brilliant: effective, adaptive, and largely unreflective. That’s the subtextual demotion. He’s downgrading a huge portion of “human intelligence” to the level of skill without inner narration.
Context matters. Mead, a founder of pragmatism and symbolic interactionism, built his theory of mind around communication and role-taking: the self forms when an organism can see itself from the standpoint of others, using shared symbols (language, gestures, norms). So the line functions as a wedge against Cartesian-style assumptions that mind and self are private substances. Intelligence can be individual; the self, for Mead, is relational. The quote works because it reframes selfhood as a public, social technology - and quietly suggests how often humans operate without it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List
