"The interest in the supernatural in a very generic sense and in the spiritual is not in itself a factor that helps the communication of the Christian faith"
About this Quote
Lehmann is swatting away a comforting shortcut: the idea that any hunger for ghosts, vibes, or vague “spirituality” naturally tilts people toward Christianity. Coming from a senior Catholic churchman who spent decades watching Europe secularize, the line reads less like scolding than triage. He’s diagnosing a pastoral illusion - that the Church can simply ride the cultural wave of New Age curiosity or paranormal fascination and call it evangelization.
The intent is deliberately deflationary. “In a very generic sense” is the tell: he’s carving out distance from the God-of-the-gaps version of faith that thrives on mystery as mood. Generic supernatural interest is, in his view, compatible with almost anything: consumer spirituality, conspiracy thinking, therapeutic self-help, even entertainment. It produces sensation and identity, not commitment, discipline, or a shared grammar of meaning. Lehmann is insisting that Christianity isn’t “the spiritual” with a cross necklace; it’s a particular story, with specific claims, ethics, and a community that makes demands.
The subtext is an internal critique of Church strategy. If you treat diffuse spiritual curiosity as a pipeline to belief, you end up marketing transcendence while dodging the hard parts: doctrine, suffering, institutional credibility, and moral authority after scandal. Lehmann’s point also quietly concedes modernity’s bargain: people may want enchantment without obedience. So the Church can’t confuse appetite for the uncanny with openness to the Gospel; it has to earn attention through intelligibility, witness, and trust.
The intent is deliberately deflationary. “In a very generic sense” is the tell: he’s carving out distance from the God-of-the-gaps version of faith that thrives on mystery as mood. Generic supernatural interest is, in his view, compatible with almost anything: consumer spirituality, conspiracy thinking, therapeutic self-help, even entertainment. It produces sensation and identity, not commitment, discipline, or a shared grammar of meaning. Lehmann is insisting that Christianity isn’t “the spiritual” with a cross necklace; it’s a particular story, with specific claims, ethics, and a community that makes demands.
The subtext is an internal critique of Church strategy. If you treat diffuse spiritual curiosity as a pipeline to belief, you end up marketing transcendence while dodging the hard parts: doctrine, suffering, institutional credibility, and moral authority after scandal. Lehmann’s point also quietly concedes modernity’s bargain: people may want enchantment without obedience. So the Church can’t confuse appetite for the uncanny with openness to the Gospel; it has to earn attention through intelligibility, witness, and trust.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Karl
Add to List






