"The Internet's been so great, and it's so nice to have fans do nice, elaborate websites, but I think the downside is some of the things... for real fans to go on and see that 90 percent of the information isn't true or to see pictures that aren't really me"
About this Quote
Denise Richards is doing the polite celebrity two-step: praise the Internet as a fan-powered gift, then quietly name the price. That opening - "so great", "so nice" - isn’t enthusiasm so much as social lubrication, a way to avoid sounding ungrateful while she points to a reality anyone famous in the early-2000s learned fast: online attention is not a scrapbook, it’s a factory.
The specificity matters. She doesn’t attack haters or tabloids; she targets the heartbreak of "real fans" encountering a version of her built out of rumor, recycled gossip, and images "that aren't really me". That phrase is doing double duty. It’s about miscaptioned photos and misinformation, sure, but it’s also about identity theft in the softer, cultural sense: the public self becoming a cheap knockoff, circulating faster than the person can correct it. Richards frames it as a downside for fans, not just for her, which is strategic empathy and also a subtle bid for control. If the audience feels duped, they’ll be more willing to accept her as the authority on her own narrative.
Context is everything: this is pre-Instagram verification culture, when unofficial fan sites, paparazzi shots, and message boards could define a celebrity’s "truth" by sheer repetition. Richards is articulating an early version of a now-familiar grievance: the Internet doesn’t merely report fame; it produces it, edits it, and occasionally deepfakes it - long before we had that word.
The specificity matters. She doesn’t attack haters or tabloids; she targets the heartbreak of "real fans" encountering a version of her built out of rumor, recycled gossip, and images "that aren't really me". That phrase is doing double duty. It’s about miscaptioned photos and misinformation, sure, but it’s also about identity theft in the softer, cultural sense: the public self becoming a cheap knockoff, circulating faster than the person can correct it. Richards frames it as a downside for fans, not just for her, which is strategic empathy and also a subtle bid for control. If the audience feels duped, they’ll be more willing to accept her as the authority on her own narrative.
Context is everything: this is pre-Instagram verification culture, when unofficial fan sites, paparazzi shots, and message boards could define a celebrity’s "truth" by sheer repetition. Richards is articulating an early version of a now-familiar grievance: the Internet doesn’t merely report fame; it produces it, edits it, and occasionally deepfakes it - long before we had that word.
Quote Details
| Topic | Internet |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Denise
Add to List
