"The key to any successful plan is buy-in from the public, and what this process has demonstrated is the importance of including citizens in formulating a consensus plan that preserves our beautiful refuge"
About this Quote
“Buy-in” is the politician’s most revealing euphemism: it flatters the public as partners while quietly reframing legitimacy as a sales problem. Ron Kind’s line is built to sound democratic, but its real work is preemptive. By declaring that the “key” is public consent, he positions any opposition not as a substantive critique of the plan, but as a failure of process - a communications gap, not a policy gap.
The phrase “what this process has demonstrated” signals a retrospective lesson, the kind of statement leaders use when they’ve already weathered conflict. It implies there was controversy, public pressure, or at least a credibility deficit that required visible participation. “Including citizens in formulating a consensus plan” is careful choreography: the verb “including” suggests openness, while “consensus” narrows the acceptable outcome to one that can be presented as broadly agreed upon. Consensus becomes both shield and cudgel - proof of listening, and a way to marginalize dissent as unreasonable or outside the community.
Then comes the emotional anchor: “preserves our beautiful refuge.” That word “our” does heavy lifting, converting a contested landscape into a shared inheritance. “Refuge” evokes sanctuary and moral obligation, blunting suspicion that the plan might involve compromise, development, or regulatory change. The intent is to fuse environmental protection with civic unity, making the plan feel like common sense rather than governance. It’s less a call for debate than a bid to launder political tradeoffs through participatory optics.
The phrase “what this process has demonstrated” signals a retrospective lesson, the kind of statement leaders use when they’ve already weathered conflict. It implies there was controversy, public pressure, or at least a credibility deficit that required visible participation. “Including citizens in formulating a consensus plan” is careful choreography: the verb “including” suggests openness, while “consensus” narrows the acceptable outcome to one that can be presented as broadly agreed upon. Consensus becomes both shield and cudgel - proof of listening, and a way to marginalize dissent as unreasonable or outside the community.
Then comes the emotional anchor: “preserves our beautiful refuge.” That word “our” does heavy lifting, converting a contested landscape into a shared inheritance. “Refuge” evokes sanctuary and moral obligation, blunting suspicion that the plan might involve compromise, development, or regulatory change. The intent is to fuse environmental protection with civic unity, making the plan feel like common sense rather than governance. It’s less a call for debate than a bid to launder political tradeoffs through participatory optics.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Ron
Add to List


