"The landlords are not agriculturists; that is an abuse of terms which has been too long tolerated"
About this Quote
Cobden’s line is a scalpel disguised as a definition. By refusing to call landlords “agriculturists,” he isn’t nitpicking vocabulary; he’s detonating a whole moral story Britain told itself about land, labor, and deservingness. “Agriculturist” suggests stewardship, expertise, and the muddy reality of making food from soil. “Landlord” suggests something else: ownership as entitlement, income as inheritance, power as tradition. Cobden’s “abuse of terms” is a charge of ideological fraud. If you let rentiers borrow the dignity of producers, you also let them borrow the political deference granted to “the people who feed the nation.”
The intent is surgical: strip the landed class of the cultural prestige that props up their economic privilege. Cobden was a businessman and a leading voice in the anti-Corn Law movement, battling tariffs that kept grain prices high and protected landowners at everyone else’s expense. In that context, the sentence reads like a move in a larger campaign to reassign legitimacy from aristocratic property to productive work and market exchange. He’s saying: don’t confuse collecting rents with creating value; don’t confuse status with service.
The subtext carries a modern sting. Language isn’t neutral in political economy; it’s the PR department of power. Cobden knows that if the ruling class gets to name itself “agriculturist,” then opposition sounds like an attack on farming rather than on monopoly. His jab clears space for a different alliance: urban workers and industrial capital against a landed elite, with words as the first battlefield.
The intent is surgical: strip the landed class of the cultural prestige that props up their economic privilege. Cobden was a businessman and a leading voice in the anti-Corn Law movement, battling tariffs that kept grain prices high and protected landowners at everyone else’s expense. In that context, the sentence reads like a move in a larger campaign to reassign legitimacy from aristocratic property to productive work and market exchange. He’s saying: don’t confuse collecting rents with creating value; don’t confuse status with service.
The subtext carries a modern sting. Language isn’t neutral in political economy; it’s the PR department of power. Cobden knows that if the ruling class gets to name itself “agriculturist,” then opposition sounds like an attack on farming rather than on monopoly. His jab clears space for a different alliance: urban workers and industrial capital against a landed elite, with words as the first battlefield.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List






