"The last three decades have seen the collapse of the family wage system"
About this Quote
“The last three decades have seen the collapse of the family wage system” is Lasch at his most cutting: a single sentence that smuggles an entire indictment of modern capitalism under the calm voice of a historian. The phrase “family wage” sounds quaint, even paternalistic, but that’s the point. Lasch is naming an older social contract in which one paycheck was imagined to underwrite not just rent and groceries, but a whole moral architecture: stable households, predictable gender roles, and a clear line between the market and “home.” By calling its disappearance a “collapse,” he frames the change as structural, not a matter of individual failure or “choices.”
The subtext is a rebuke to the feel-good narratives of postwar prosperity and later “liberation” rhetoric. Lasch suggests that what looks like progress (more women entering paid work, more consumption, more flexibility) is also an economic compulsion: wages stagnate, benefits thin out, and the household becomes a shock absorber for an economy that no longer guarantees security. The family stops being a protected sphere and becomes a small firm, forced to supply its own childcare, eldercare, and emotional stability while both adults sell more hours to stay afloat.
Context matters: Lasch wrote in the shadow of deindustrialization, the decline of unions, and the rise of a service economy and dual-income norm. His intent isn’t nostalgia for the 1950s so much as a warning that when economic policy dissolves the conditions for ordinary stability, culture gets blamed for what markets engineered. The sting is that he makes “family values” look less like a sermon and more like a balance sheet.
The subtext is a rebuke to the feel-good narratives of postwar prosperity and later “liberation” rhetoric. Lasch suggests that what looks like progress (more women entering paid work, more consumption, more flexibility) is also an economic compulsion: wages stagnate, benefits thin out, and the household becomes a shock absorber for an economy that no longer guarantees security. The family stops being a protected sphere and becomes a small firm, forced to supply its own childcare, eldercare, and emotional stability while both adults sell more hours to stay afloat.
Context matters: Lasch wrote in the shadow of deindustrialization, the decline of unions, and the rise of a service economy and dual-income norm. His intent isn’t nostalgia for the 1950s so much as a warning that when economic policy dissolves the conditions for ordinary stability, culture gets blamed for what markets engineered. The sting is that he makes “family values” look less like a sermon and more like a balance sheet.
Quote Details
| Topic | Family |
|---|
More Quotes by Christopher
Add to List
