"The Lebanese people voted this time for change. So they are not satisfied with the actual situation. They want to see a new government. They want to see a new vision"
About this Quote
Hariri’s line is doing the classic statesman’s two-step: interpreting an election as both a rebuke and a mandate, while carefully deciding who gets to own that mandate. “The Lebanese people voted this time for change” frames the ballot not as a messy split of factions but as a single, legible verdict. In a country where politics is often read through sect, patronage networks, and postwar power-sharing, that move is rhetorical force: he tries to lift a fragmented result into the moral clarity of a popular will.
The repetition is the point. “They want to see…” lands like a drumbeat, shifting from dissatisfaction (“not satisfied”) to aspiration (“new government,” “new vision”). “New government” is the practical promise; “new vision” is the larger sell, the attempt to make policy feel like destiny. It’s also a subtle rebranding of authority: Hariri isn’t only asking to govern, he’s presenting himself as the translator of public desire into a coherent national project.
The subtext is defensive as much as ambitious. By attributing the impulse to “the Lebanese people,” he inoculates the project against accusations of personal ambition or foreign alignment. He’s implying that resistance to his agenda isn’t just political opposition; it’s opposition to “change” itself.
Context matters: Hariri’s Lebanon was navigating reconstruction after civil war, heavy Syrian influence, and a public exhausted by corruption and stagnation. “Change” becomes a safe word that can hold contradictory hopes at once - modernization without upheaval, reform without losing the brittle balance of the system. The genius (and risk) is that “new vision” invites everyone in, then leaves the bill to be paid in power.
The repetition is the point. “They want to see…” lands like a drumbeat, shifting from dissatisfaction (“not satisfied”) to aspiration (“new government,” “new vision”). “New government” is the practical promise; “new vision” is the larger sell, the attempt to make policy feel like destiny. It’s also a subtle rebranding of authority: Hariri isn’t only asking to govern, he’s presenting himself as the translator of public desire into a coherent national project.
The subtext is defensive as much as ambitious. By attributing the impulse to “the Lebanese people,” he inoculates the project against accusations of personal ambition or foreign alignment. He’s implying that resistance to his agenda isn’t just political opposition; it’s opposition to “change” itself.
Context matters: Hariri’s Lebanon was navigating reconstruction after civil war, heavy Syrian influence, and a public exhausted by corruption and stagnation. “Change” becomes a safe word that can hold contradictory hopes at once - modernization without upheaval, reform without losing the brittle balance of the system. The genius (and risk) is that “new vision” invites everyone in, then leaves the bill to be paid in power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Rafic
Add to List

