"The lopsided attitudes of college professors pose a serious challenge to learning because students are so susceptible to becoming lopsided sheep"
About this Quote
Fields loads the sentence like a trap: "lopsided" lands twice, first on professors, then on students, so the imbalance feels contagious. It’s not an argument built from evidence so much as a moral panic staged in miniature. By framing professors as the origin of distortion and students as passive recipients, she turns the classroom into a one-way pipeline of ideology, not a contested space where ideas get tested.
The word choice does the heavy lifting. "Attitudes" keeps the charge vague enough to cover anything from political beliefs to cultural tastes, while "pose a serious challenge" borrows the cadence of policy talk, as if a faculty lounge were a national security problem. Then comes the real payload: "susceptible" and "sheep". That metaphor doesn’t merely criticize students for conformity; it pre-emptively disqualifies disagreement. If a student ends up sharing a professor’s worldview, the implication is that it wasn’t persuasion or reasoning but infection.
Subtext: the author is less worried about education than about authority. The quote positions the professoriate as an illegitimate elite - insulated, biased, and quietly manufacturing consensus - while casting students as an easily manipulated public. In the broader cultural context of long-running "campus bias" fights, it’s a familiar conservative rhetorical move: shift debate from the content of ideas to the integrity of the institution that hosts them. The irony is that the line warns against lopsidedness with an intentionally lopsided story: teachers as villains, students as dupes, and learning as collateral damage.
The word choice does the heavy lifting. "Attitudes" keeps the charge vague enough to cover anything from political beliefs to cultural tastes, while "pose a serious challenge" borrows the cadence of policy talk, as if a faculty lounge were a national security problem. Then comes the real payload: "susceptible" and "sheep". That metaphor doesn’t merely criticize students for conformity; it pre-emptively disqualifies disagreement. If a student ends up sharing a professor’s worldview, the implication is that it wasn’t persuasion or reasoning but infection.
Subtext: the author is less worried about education than about authority. The quote positions the professoriate as an illegitimate elite - insulated, biased, and quietly manufacturing consensus - while casting students as an easily manipulated public. In the broader cultural context of long-running "campus bias" fights, it’s a familiar conservative rhetorical move: shift debate from the content of ideas to the integrity of the institution that hosts them. The irony is that the line warns against lopsidedness with an intentionally lopsided story: teachers as villains, students as dupes, and learning as collateral damage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Suzanne
Add to List




