"The mainstream media doesn't want to get into this because they don't want to know where this one goes"
About this Quote
Curt Weldon’s line is less an argument than a trapdoor. It sets up a familiar populist drama: a lone truth-teller pointing toward a hidden corridor while the “mainstream media” plays the role of anxious gatekeeper. The genius is in the vagueness. “This” is never named, which lets listeners pour in whatever scandal, conspiracy, or grievance already lives rent-free in their head. “Where this one goes” promises a narrative arc - not just facts, but a destination, a payoff, the sense that you’re on the verge of forbidden knowledge.
The subtext is an inversion of journalistic motive. Reporters aren’t cautious because claims might be unverified, defamatory, or complex; they’re cautious because they’re scared of the truth. That move shifts the burden of proof. If evidence is thin, that becomes proof of suppression. If the story doesn’t land, it’s because powerful people blocked it. Weldon also flatters his audience by casting them as savvy insiders, immune to the supposed hypnosis of “mainstream” consensus.
As a politician, the intent is tactical. It delegitimizes a key institution that can fact-check you, and it pre-bakes an alibi for why your allegation isn’t dominating front pages. It’s also a recruitment pitch: if you’re the kind of person who “wants to know where this goes,” you’re invited to follow him past the guardrails of conventional verification. The line works because it makes curiosity feel like courage and skepticism feel like complicity.
The subtext is an inversion of journalistic motive. Reporters aren’t cautious because claims might be unverified, defamatory, or complex; they’re cautious because they’re scared of the truth. That move shifts the burden of proof. If evidence is thin, that becomes proof of suppression. If the story doesn’t land, it’s because powerful people blocked it. Weldon also flatters his audience by casting them as savvy insiders, immune to the supposed hypnosis of “mainstream” consensus.
As a politician, the intent is tactical. It delegitimizes a key institution that can fact-check you, and it pre-bakes an alibi for why your allegation isn’t dominating front pages. It’s also a recruitment pitch: if you’re the kind of person who “wants to know where this goes,” you’re invited to follow him past the guardrails of conventional verification. The line works because it makes curiosity feel like courage and skepticism feel like complicity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Curt
Add to List


